Role of the caudal Nucleus Tractus Solitarius and the Postinspiratory Complex in swallow production

Abstract

The production of swallowing and its coordination with breathing is essential for homeostasis in most organisms. The postinspiratory complex (PiCo) is thought to regulate the transition between swallowing and breathing. Activation of PiCo triggers swallow production and stimulates laryngeal activation in a respiratory phase specific manner. However, little is known about PiCo’s role in swallow generation, which is thought to be controlled by the caudal portion of the Nucleus Tractus Solitarius (cNTS), presumably the swallow pattern generator (SPG). We hypothesize the cNTS is necessary for PiCo to trigger a swallow. Using both male and female Vglut2cre mice, a cre-dependent ChR2 AAV was bilaterally injected into PiCo and a cre-dependent inhibitory DREADD was bilaterally injected into the cNTS, specifically targeting the interstitial (SolI) and intermediate (SolIM) solitary nucleus. Twenty-one days after injection, using our freely breathing urethane anesthetized mouse model, swallows were stimulated by 1) injection of water into the oral cavity and 2) optogenetic stimulation of PiCo neurons; before and after DREADD activator, clozapine-N-oxide (CNO). Swallow and laryngeal activity were measured via monopolar suction electrodes of the hypoglossal (XII) and vagus (X) nerves as well as bipolar electromyogram (EMG) of the submental, laryngeal complex and costal diaphragm muscles. Post-hoc histological analysis was done to confirm areas of interest were targeted. We found that after activation of the inhibitory DREADD, located in the cNTS, swallow was not evoked by water stimulation nor optogenetic stimulation. We propose that PiCo relies on direct feedback from the cNTS in order to trigger swallow production. NIH F32 HL160102. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.