Role of GSTM1 and GSTT1 Gene Polymorphisms on Lung Cancer Susceptibility and Effect on Platinum‐Based Chemotherapy‐Induced Toxicity in Bangladeshi Lung Cancer Patients

What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Bladder cancer susceptibility may be determined by genetic differences in the activity of glutathione S-transferases, enzymes that regulate the conversion of exogenous carcinogens to excretable hydrophilic metabolites by glutathione conjugation. The discrepancy of results regarding the association of common genetic polymorphisms and complex diseases such as cancer has raised scepticism in this area of research. Although the evidence generally supports the implication of GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms in bladder cancer, there is still some debate, with some studies in favour and some against. This study shows a greater risk of bladder cancer in individuals with GSTM1 null genotype, particularly women. This relationship is less evident with GSTT1 null genotypes. Null genotypes in both genes appear to be synergistic, particularly among smokers, and to increase the predisposition to more aggressive tumours. Nevertheless, the role of GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms in predisposition to bladder cancer should be viewed with caution, due to the multifactorial genetic origin of this condition and the need for long-term longitudinal studies to confirm these results. To estimate the prevalence and importance of GSTT1 and GSTM1 genotypes (implicated in glutathione S-transferase activity) in bladder cancer, to determine whether smoking and occupational factors influence this relationship, and to identify the value of GSTT1 and GSTM1 genotypes as prognostic factors. A cross-sectional study was conducted with a group of patients with bladder carcinoma and a control group with benign conditions and no history of tumours. The controls were selected and paired as subjects were recruited. Sociodemographic variables, smoking, professional occupation, histological features and the presence of GSTT1 and GSTM1 polymorphisms by multiplex PCR techniques were assessed. GSTM1 genotypes were investigated in 201 patients and 193 controls and GSTT1 genotypes in 190 patients and 163 controls. In the patients group, GSTT1 null genotype was observed in 22.1% (not significant) and GSTM1 null genotype in 54.2% (P=0.008) (odds ratio, OR, 1.7); when considered together, 15.5% (P<0.05; OR, 3.5) of patients had both null genotypes. In the multivariate analysis, the presence of GSTM1 null genotype remained in the model (OR, 2.1) in addition to smoking and age. Subjects with bladder tumour and GSTM1 null genotype were younger than patients without gene deletion (P=0.049). Women with GSTM1 null genotype presented a higher OR than men (P=0.024). When stratified by smoking habit, smokers with both null genotypes showed an OR of 4.7. The percentage of patients with G3 tumours was higher in patients with GSTT1 null genotype (P=0.013) and in patients with both null genotypes (P=0.002). A higher percentage of infiltrating tumours was also observed in patients with both null genotypes (P=0.035). The data obtained in the present study suggest a higher risk of bladder cancer in individuals with the GSTM1 null genotype. This risk is twofold higher when GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes are both present and is also higher in smokers. A greater predisposition for more aggressive tumours appears to exist, particularly when both null genotypes are combined. Longer-term longitudinal studies are needed to confirm these results.

Susceptibility to lung cancer has been shown to be modulated by inheritance of polymorphic genes encoding cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) and glutathione S transferases (GSTM1 and GSTT1), which are involved in the bioactivation and detoxification of environmental toxins. As the incidence of lung cancer is known to differ according to ethnicity, we have conducted a case-control study of 146 South Indian lung cancer patients along with 146 healthy controls, to assess any association between CYP1A1, GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms, either separately or in combination, with the likelihood of development of lung cancer in our population. The current weight of evidence from our study indicated that the frequency of CYP1A1 MspI homozygous variant alleles was significantly higher in cases (OR = 3.178). We observed a considerable difference in the GSTT1 null deletion frequency in this population when compared with other populations (OR = 2.472, 95% CI: 1.191-5.094, P = 0.014). There was no relative risk in GSTM1 null genotype when analysed singly (P = 0.453). Considering genotype combinations, risk of lung cancer increased remarkably significantly in individuals having one variant allele of CYP1A1, GSTM1, or GSTT1, suggesting gene-gene interactions. Rare genotypic combinations (such as CYP1A1 wild GSTM1 or GSTT1 either null; CYP1A1 variant both GSTM1 and GSTT1 present; CYP1A1 variant GSTM1 or GSTT1 either null), were at higher risk compared to the reference group. Moreover, patients who had smoked <20 pack years and harboured the CYP1A1 variant allele or the GSTT1 null genotype also had a significant risk of lung cancer. Hence our study-the first to analyse a South Indian population-suggests the importance of combined CYP1A1, GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms in the development of smoking-induced lung cancer.

GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 polymorphism and lung cancer risk in relation to tobacco smoking

Lung cancer susceptibility and polymorphisms of glutathione-S-transferase genes in Hong Kong

Combination of CC16, GSTM1, and GSTT1 genetic polymorphisms is associated with asthma

Studies pertaining to association of GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes with risk of T2DM and its complications were often inconclusive, thus spurring the present study. Meta-analysis of 25 studies for evaluating the role of GSTM1/GSTT1 null polymorphisms in determining the risk for T2DM and 17 studies for evaluating the role of GSTM1/GSTT1 null polymorphisms in development of T2DM related complications were conducted. Our study revealed an association between GSTM1 and GSTT1 null polymorphism with T2DM (GSTM1; OR=1.37;95% CI =1.10-1.70 and GSTT1; OR=1.29;95% CI =1.04-1.61) with an amplified risk of 2.02 fold for combined GSTM1-GSTT1 null genotypes. Furthermore, the GSTT1 null (OR=1.56;95%CI=1.38-1.77) and combined GSTM1-GSTT1 null genotypes (OR=1.91;95%CI=1.25- 2.94) increased the risk for development of T2DM related complications, but not the GSTM1 null genotype. Stratified analyses based on ethnicity revealed GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes increase the risk for T2DM in both Caucasians and Asians, with Asians showing much higher risk of T2DM complications than Caucasians for the same. GSTM1, GSTT1 and combined GSTM1-GSTT1 null polymorphism may be associated with increased risk for T2DM; while GSTT1 and combined GSTM1-GSTT1 null polymorphism may increase the risk of subsequent development of T2DM complications with Asian population carrying an amplified risk for the polymorphism. Thus GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes increases the risk for Type 2 diabetes mellitus alone, in combination or with regards to ethnicity.

Occupational exposure to benzene has been associated with leukemia, anemia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia. Genetic susceptibility to benzene toxicity in humans may be related to variations in benzene metabolizing genes. The main objective of this study was to ascertain whether polymorphism of GSTP1, GSTM1, GSTT1 and CYP2E1 genes might influence susceptibility to the adverse effects of benzene among employees of a petrochemical plant. In this cross-sectional study, 124 employees of a petrochemical plant who had been occupationally exposed to benzene and had one or more abnormal hematological parameter (cases) and 184 subjects with a similar exposure scenario, free from any abnormal hematological parameters (referent) were studied. Atmospheric concentrations of benzene were measured and GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotypes were evaluated using the multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique. Additionally, GSTP1 and CYP2E1 genotypes were determined by PCR- restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR–RFLP). The frequency of null GSTT1 genotype in cases was significantly higher than that of referent group (32.3 vs. 18.5%, OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.23–3.56, p = 0.004). The mean value of platelets in subjects with null GSTT1 genotype was significantly lower than that of individuals with positive GSTT1 genotype (p = 0.015). Conversely, the mean value of leukocytes was significantly higher in subjects with null GSTM1 genotype as compared to those with positive GSTM1 genotype (p = 0.026). Logistic regression analysis showed that, subjects with null GSTT1 genotype had a significantly higher risk for hematological disorders, as compared to those with positive GSTT1 genotype (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.23–3.56). Moreover, subjects with both null GSTT1 and GSTM1 genotypes had a significantly higher risk for hematological disorders as compared to subjects with positive GSTT1 and GSTM1 genotypes (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.14–4.8). The results of this study showed that, individuals carrying null GSTT1 or both null STT1 and GSTM1 genotypes had a higher risk and were more susceptible to benzene-induced hematological disorders.

Background and ObjectivesThe GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms might be involved in inactivation of procarcinogens that contribute to the genesis and progression of cancers. However, studies investigating the association between GSTM1, GSTT1 or GSTP1 polymorphisms and prostate cancer (PCa) risk report conflicting results, therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to re-examine the controversy.MethodsPublished literature from PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched (updated to June 2, 2012). According to our inclusion criteria, studies that observed the association between GSTM1, GSTT1 or GSTP1 polymorphisms and PCa risk were included. The principal outcome measure was the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for the risk of PCa associated with GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms.ResultsFifty-seven studies involving 11313 cases and 12934 controls were recruited. The overall OR, which was 1.2854 (95% CI = 1.1405–1.4487), revealed a significant risk of PCa and GSTM1 null genotype, and the similar results were observed when stratified by ethnicity and control source. Further, the more important is that the present study first reported the high risks of PCa for people who with dual null genotype of GSTM1 and GSTT1 (OR = 1.4353, 95% CI = 1.0345–1.9913), or who with GSTT1 null genotype and GSTP1 A131G polymorphism (OR = 1.7335, 95% CI = 1.1067–2.7152). But no association was determined between GSTT1 null genotype (OR = 1.102, 95% CI = 0.9596–1.2655) or GSTP1 A131G polymorphism (OR = 1.0845, 95% CI = 0.96–1.2251) and the PCa risk.ConclusionsOur meta-analysis suggested that the people with GSTM1 null genotype, with dual null genotype of GSTM1 and GSTT1, or with GSTT1 null genotype and GSTP1 A131G polymorphism are associated with high risks of PCa, but no association was found between GSTT1 null genotype or GSTP1 A131G polymorphism and the risk of PCa. Further rigorous analytical studies are highly expected to confirm our conclusions and assess gene-environment interactions with PCa risk.

Genetic polymorphisms of GSTM1, GSTP1 and GSTT1 genes and lung cancer susceptibility in the Bangladeshi population

Background: Fourteen meta-analyses reported the individual effects of the GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms on leukemia risk. However, over 40 studies were not included in previously published meta-analyses. Moreover, one key aspect was that previous meta-analyses did not conduct the false-positive test on the aforementioned issues. Furthermore, previous meta-analyses did not observe the combined effects of GSTM1 present/null and GSTT1 present/null polymorphism with leukemia risk. Therefore, we conducted the current study to further analyze these associations. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the association between the individual and combined effects of the GSTM1 present/null and GSTT1 present/null polymorphisms and the risk of leukemia. Methods: A meta-analysis was performed applying Meta-analyses of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. Moreover, false-positive report probability (FPRP) and Bayesian false discovery probability (BFDP) were applied to investigate the false-positive results. Results: The individual GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes and combined effects of the two genes were associated with a significantly increased leukemia risk in overall and several subgroup analyses, such as Asians, Caucasians, and so on. Then, further analysis was conducted using FPRP and BFDP. Significant associations were considered as “positive” results on the GSTM1 null genotype with leukemia risk in overall populations (FPRP < 0.001 and BFDP = 0.006), Asians (FPRP < 0.001 and BFDP < 0.001), and East Asian population (FPRP < 0.001 and BFDP = 0.002). For the GSTT1 null genotype, significant associations were regarded “positive” results in overall populations, acute myeloid leukemia (AML), Asians, and East Asian population. For the combined effects of the GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms, significant associations were also considered “positive” results in the overall analysis of Asians, Indians, and East Asian population. Conclusion: This study strongly indicates that the individual GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes and combined effects of the two genes are associated with increased leukemia risk in Asians, especially in the East Asian population; the GSTT1 null genotype is associated with increased AML risk; the combined effects of the two genes are associated with increased leukemia risk in Indians.

Effects of GST null genotypes on individual susceptibility to leukemia: A meta-analysis

Rosacea might be related to an increased activity of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and deficient function of the antioxidant system. Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) play a primer role in cellular defense against electrophilic chemical species and radical oxygen species. We hypothesized that increased ROS activity or decreased antioxidant potential, possibly induced by GST gene polymorphism, might have a pathogenic role in rosacea. The study group consisted of 45 patients with rosacea and 100 control subjects. DNA samples were isolated from blood samples using high pure polymerase chain reaction (PCR) Template preparation Kit. The GSTM1, GSTT1, and P1 polymorphisms were detected using a real-time PCR and fluorescence resonance energy transfer with a Light-Cycler Instrument. Associations between specific genotypes and the development of rosacea were examined using logistic regression analyses to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes were found to be statistically different from control (P=0.005, P=0.009, respectively), and associated with an increased risk of rosacea (OR [95% CI]: 2.84 [1.37-5.89]; OR [95% CI]: 2.68 [1.27-5.67], respectively). There was a statistically significant relationship between both null combination of the GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotype polymorphisms and rosacea (P=0.003, OR [95% CI]: 4.18 [1.57-11.13]). There were no statistically significant differences between patient and control groups for the GSTP1 Ile/Ile, Ile/Val, and Val/Val genotypes (P>0.05). We demonstrated a significant association between the GSTT1 and/or GSTM1 null genotypes and rosacea. However, the potential role of GSTs as markers of susceptibility to rosacea needs further studies in larger patient groups.

Glutathione transferases, a super family of dimeric phase II metabolic enzymes play a vital role in biotransformation of many substances. This study evaluates the influence of genetic polymorphism of GSTM1 and GSTT1 gene loci on esophageal cancer risk in Assam and Delhi from India. DNA from blood samples of esophageal cancer cases (203,112) and controls (286,150) from Assam and Delhi, respectively, were extracted. GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms were analyzed by multiplex PCR procedure. Differences in proportions were tested using Pearson's chi-square test with odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI). Risk of esophageal cancer was approximately twice in individuals having homozygous GSTM1 (OR-2.1, 95 % CI, 1.44-3.13) and GSTT1 null genotypes (OR-1.7,95 % CI, 0.99-2.77) in Assam, and around three times in GSTT1 null genotype (OR-2.9, 95 % CI, 1.56-5.27) in Delhi population. GSTM1 null genotype seems to play a protective role (OR-0.7, 95 % CI, 0.39-1.27) in Delhi. A significant association of GSTM1 null genotype with esophageal cancer was observed in a younger age group in Assam (OR-2.7, 95 % CI, 1.48-5.01), and in Delhi population association was observed in smokers with GSTT1 null genotype (OR-2.5, 95 % CI, 1.04-6.07), and alcoholics having GSTM1 null genotype (OR-2.6, 95 % CI, 0.99-6.77). Significant association of GSTM1 null genotype in Assam was observed between cancer cases and controls in fermented betel nut chewers only (OR-2.8, 95 % CI, 1.19-6.72), whereas, smoking and alcohol failed to show any correlation with GSTM1/GSTT1 genotypes. Cancer development is not only due to exogenous or endogenous carcinogens but depends on their interaction with genes that are involved in the detoxification of these carcinogens.

Prognostic potential of glutathione S-transferase M1 and T1 null genotypes for gastric cancer progression

Background Toluene diisocyanate (TDI) causes occupational asthma by generating oxidative stress, leading to tissue injury and inflammation. Glutathione transferases (GSTs) are detoxifying enzymes that eliminate oxidative stress. We examined whether the genotypes of the GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes are associated with TDI-induced occupational asthma (TDI-OA). Methods The study population consisted of 26 asthmatics with a positive response to the TDI challenge (TDI-PA) and 27 asthmatics with negative responses (TDI-NA). GSTM1 and GSTT1 null and wild-type genotypes were determined using multiplex PCR. The plasma GSTM1 and GSTT1 protein concentrations were determined using ELISA. Results The GSTM1 null genotype was more frequent in the TDI-PA than in the TDI-NA (77.8 vs. 50.0%, OR = 3.5, p=0.03), while the frequency of the GSTT1 null genotype tended to be higher in the TDI-PA than in the TDI-NA (59.3 vs. 42.3%, OR = 1.98, p=0.21). When analyzed together, the GSTM1/GSTT1 null genotype was more frequent in the TDI-PA than in the TDI-NA (48.2 vs. 15.3%, OR = 6.5, p=0.04). The decline in the FEV in 1 s after TDI challenge was higher with the GSTM1/GSTT1 null than the GSTM1 wild-type/GSTT1 null genotypes (24.29% vs. 7.47%, p=0.02). The plasma GSTM1 level was lower with the GSTM1 null than with the GSTM1 wild-type genotypes both before (13.7 vs. 16.6 ng/mg, p=0.04) and after (12.9 vs. 17.1 ng/mg, p=0.007) the TDI challenge, while the GSTT1 level was not changed with either the GSTT1 null or wild-type genotype. Conclusions The GSTM1 null genotype, but not GSTT1 alone, may confer susceptibility to TDI-OA. However, the genetic effect of the GSTM1 null genotype may be enhanced synergistically by the GSTT1 null genotype. The genetic effect of GSTM1 was validated in the plasma as the GSTM1 protein level. Therefore, the GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotypes may be useful diagnostic markers for TDI-OA.