Abstract

The use of bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) reporter constructs in molecular physiology enables the inclusion of large sections of flanking DNA, likely to contain regulatory elements and enhancers regions that contribute to the transcriptional output of a gene. Using BAC recombineering, we have manipulated a 160-kb human prolactin luciferase (hPRL-Luc) BAC construct and mutated the previously defined proximal estrogen response element (ERE) located −1189 bp relative to the transcription start site, to assess its involvement in the estrogen responsiveness of the entire hPRL locus. We found that GH3 cell lines stably expressing Luc under control of the ERE-mutated hPRL promoter (ERE-Mut) displayed a dramatically reduced transcriptional response to 17β-estradiol (E2) treatment compared with cells expressing Luc from the wild-type (WT) ERE hPRL-Luc promoter (ERE-WT). The −1189 ERE controls not only the response to E2 treatment but also the acute transcriptional response to TNFα, which was abolished in ERE-Mut cells. ERE-WT cells displayed a biphasic transcriptional response after TNFα treatment, the acute phase of which was blocked after treatment with the estrogen receptor antagonist 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen. Unexpectedly, we show the oscillatory characteristics of hPRL promoter activity in individual living cells were unaffected by disruption of this crucial response element, real-time bioluminescence imaging showed that transcription cycles were maintained, with similar cycle lengths, in ERE-WT and ERE-Mut cells. These data suggest the −1189 ERE is the dominant response element involved in the hPRL transcriptional response to both E2 and TNFα and, crucially, that cycles of hPRL promoter activity are independent of estrogen receptor binding.

Highlights

  • We found that GH3 cell lines stably expressing Luc under control of the estrogen response element (ERE)-mutated human PRL (hPRL) promoter (ERE-Mut) displayed a dramatically reduced transcriptional response to 17␤-estradiol (E2) treatment compared with cells expressing Luc from the wild-type (WT) ERE hPRL-Luc promoter (ERE-WT)

  • Comparison of the mean response of clonal cell lines found no significant difference in reporter gene expression between ERE-WT and ERE-Mut cell lines (Figure 6, A and B, respectively) implying the Ϫ1189 ERE region is not involved in the hPRL transcriptional response to these stimuli

  • The use of bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) reporter constructs in molecular physiology enables the inclusion press.endocrine.org/journal/mend 195

Read more

Summary

Role of Estrogen Response Element in the Human Prolactin Gene

Citation for published version: McNamara, AV, Adamson, AD, Dunham, LSS, Semprini, S, Spiller, DG, McNeilly, AS, Mullins, JJ, Davis, JRE & White, MRH 2016, 'Role of Estrogen Response Element in the Human Prolactin Gene: Transcriptional Response and Timing', Molecular Endocrinology, vol 30, no.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Materials and Methods
Cell culture and generation of stable transfectant BAC cell lines
Findings
Discussion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.