Abstract

This paper presents an application of H/sub /spl infin// and /spl mu/-synthesis controller design methods to a coal-fired power generation unit and compares the closed loop performance and robustness of H/sub /spl infin// and /spl mu/-synthesis control laws with those of an H/sub 2/ control law. All three controller synthesis procedures are applied to a two-input two-output plant model which has time delay, differential part, colored noise output disturbance and sensor noise disturbance. Application of the procedures to the model shows that when the shape of the closed loop control signals of all three designs Is closely matched, in the low frequency range the /spl mu/-synthesis and H/sub /spl infin// control laws have robustness much better than that of H/sub 2/ control law, while providing adequate robustness in the high frequency range. H/sub /spl infin// control law gives the best performance, and H/sub 2/-the worst of the three designs, exhibiting the largest overshoot. The balancing procedure permits significant reduction of the order of the controllers without degradation in performance and robustness. The comparative evaluation of three designs shows that in power plant control problem H/sub /spl infin// and /spl mu/-synthesis designs provide much more consistent and convenient performance/robustness trade-off than H/sub 2/ design.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.