Robot assisted radical nephrectomy with inferior vena cava thrombectomy; feasibility and outcome for level 3 thrombus with suprahepatic clamping

A Decade of Robotic-Assisted Radical Nephrectomy with Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes.

V9-08 ROBOT ASSISTED RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY AND INFERIOR VENA CAVA THROMBECTOMY: SURGICAL TECHNIQUE, PERIOPERATIVE AND EARLY ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES

BackgroundWe aimed to compare the oncological outcomes between the oblique occlusion technique and the traditional technique for robot-assisted radical nephrectomy (RARN) with inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombectomy, and to explore the safety and effectiveness of the oblique occlusion technique.MethodsOverall, 21 patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and IVC tumor thrombus (TT) were admitted to our hospital from August 2019 to June 2020. All the patients underwent RARN with IVC thrombectomy, of which the IVC oblique occlusion technique was used in 11 patients and traditional occlusion technique was used in 10 patients. The oblique occlusion technique refers to oblique blocking from the upper corner of the right renal vein to the lower corner of the left renal vein using a vessel tourniquet or a vessel clamp (left RCC with IVCTT as an example).ResultsCompared with patients in the traditional group, those in the oblique group had lower serum creatinine at follow-up (3 month) (95 ± 21.1 vs. 131 ± 30.7 μmol/L, P = 0.03). There was no significant difference in operation time [149 (IQR 143–245) min vs. 148 (IQR 108–261) min, p = 0.86], IVC clamping time [18 (IQR 12–20) min vs. 20 (IQR 14–23) min, p = 0.41], and estimated intraoperative blood loss [300 (IQR 100–800) mL vs. 500 (IQR 175–738) mL, p = 0.51] between both groups. During a 16-month (range, 15–23 months) follow-up period, two cases progressed in the oblique group and three cases progressed in the traditional group.ConclusionsThe modified IVC oblique occlusion technique procedure is relatively safe and effective in RARN with IVC thrombectomy. The IVC oblique occlusion technique may play a role in the protection of renal function.

Objectives: To compare the perioperative hemodynamic consequences and oncology outcomes of robotic retroperitoneal vs transperitoneal inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombectomy (IVCT) for right renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with IVC tumor thrombus (IVCTT) that located below the first porta hepatis. Patients and Methods: Between January 2018 and June 2019, 35 patients of right RCC with IVCTT that located below the first porta hepatis underwent robotic retroperitoneal IVCT (16 patients) or transperitoneal IVCT (19 patients). We have described the procedures of transperitoneal IVCT earlier. The main procedure of robotic retroperitoneal IVCT include circumferential dissection of the IVC, sequentially clamping subhepatic IVC, the left renal vein and the caudal IVC with vessel loops, IVCT, IVC repair, and radical nephrectomy (RN). The following parameters were compared between the two groups: baselines characteristic, perioperative consequences, and hemodynamic changes. Results: Retroperitoneal and transperitoneal cohorts were comparable in terms of IVC thrombus length (3.2 vs 4.0 cm), IVC block time (18 vs 16 minutes, p = 0.64), postoperative hospital stay (6 vs 6 days, p = 0.67), postoperative complications (0 vs 0), and recurrence or metastasis rate (0 vs 0) for patients with similar baseline characteristic. The retroperitoneal cohort tended to less blood loss (160 vs 240 mL, p = 0.024), shorter operative time (130 vs 145 minutes, p = 0.003), lower central venous pressure (p < 0.05), and smaller diameter of IVC (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Robotic retroperitoneal RN and IVCT is feasible for patients of right RCC with IVCTT located below the first porta hepatis and is superior to transperitoneal IVCT in terms of bleeding control and operation time for skilled surgeons.

Objective To assess feasibility of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (RALRN) and inferior vena cava thrombectomy (IVCT) in treating renal tumours with level I–III IVC thrombi and to assess their outcomes. Patients and methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of RALRN-IVCTs, involving four centres across India, from September 2015 to June 2019. We analysed patients who underwent RALRN-IVCT for level I–III thrombi according to the Mayo classification. The total operative duration with console time, length of hospital stay, preoperative and postoperative creatinine, IVC clamp time and intraoperative blood loss were recorded. Results Of the 13 patients that underwent RALRN-IVCT, five had a level I thrombus, seven had level II, and one had a level III thrombus. In all, 11 of the patients had right-sided tumours and the remaining two had left-sided tumours. The mean (SD) age of the patients was 56.5 (12.3) years, the mean (SD) operative time was 329.5 (97.22) min, the mean (SD) console time was 222.5 (70) min, the mean (SD) blood loss was 395 (170) mL, and the mean (SD) IVC clamp time was 19.14 (9.5) min. The mean (SD) length of hospital stay was 7.8 (3.27) days. Of the 13 patients, 12 had clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and one had papillary RCC. The mean (range) follow-up was 19 (4–50) months. One patient had upfront metastasis and two patients developed metastasis, while 10 patients remained disease-free during the follow-up. Conclusion With appropriate patient selection, surgical planning and robotic experience, completely intracorporeal robotic level I–III IVCT is feasible and can be performed efficiently. Larger experiences, with longer follow-ups and comparisons with open surgery are needed to confirm these initial outcomes. Abbreviations ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; IVC: inferior vena cava; IVCT: inferior vena cava thrombectomy; (RAL)RN: (robot-assisted laparoscopic) radical nephrectomy

V8-03 ROBOT ASSISTED RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY AND INFERIOR VENA CAVA THROMBECTOMY: SURGICAL TECHNIQUE, PERIOPERATIVE AND ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES

BACKGROUND The aim of this paper was to assess the feasibility of robot-assisted radical nephrectomy (RN) with inferior vena cava thrombectomy (RRVCT) and compare perioperative and oncological outcomes of this approach to open surgery for renal tumors with level 1-2 inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombus. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of patients surgically treated for renal cancer with IVC level 1-2 thrombus in the Urology department of Bordeaux University Hospital between December 2015 and December 2019. Patients were stratified by surgical approach in two groups: open vs. robotic procedures. Pre-, per- and postoperative data were collected within the framework of the UroCCR project (NCT03293563). Univariate and multivariate analysis using regression models were performed. RESULTS A total of 40 patients underwent RN with IVC tumor thrombus. Open and robotic surgery represented respectively 30 and 10 cases. The two groups were comparable regarding pre-operative tumor and patient characteristics. Robotic procedures were associated with lower estimated blood loss (EBL) (500 vs. 1250 mL, P=0.02), shorter Intensive Care Unit stay (2 vs. 4 days, P=0.03) and decrease of global length of stay (LOS) (7 vs. 10 days, P<0.01). Operative Time (OT) was significantly longer in the robotic group (350.5 vs. 208 min, P<0.01). No difference were observed between the two approaches regarding complications and oncological outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Robotic approach induced lower bleeding and shorter LOS but required longer OT. This technique is feasible and safe for selected cases and experimented surgical teams. Complications rate and oncological outcomes are not different compared to standard open procedures.

The aim of this paper was to assess the feasibility of robot-assisted radical nephrectomy (RN) with inferior vena cava thrombectomy (RRVCT) and compare perioperative and oncological outcomes of this approach to open surgery for renal tumors with level 1-2 inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombus. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients surgically treated for renal cancer with IVC level 1-2 thrombus in the Urology department of Bordeaux University Hospital between December 2015 and December 2019. Patients were stratified by surgical approach in two groups: open vs. robotic procedures. Pre-, per- and postoperative data were collected within the framework of the UroCCR project (NCT03293563). Univariate and multivariate analysis using regression models were performed. A total of 40 patients underwent RN with IVC tumor thrombus. Open and robotic surgery represented respectively 30 and 10 cases. The two groups were comparable regarding pre-operative tumor and patient characteristics. Robotic procedures were associated with lower estimated blood loss (EBL) (500 vs. 1250 mL, P=0.02), shorter Intensive Care Unit stay (2 vs. 4 days, P=0.03) and decrease of global length of stay (LOS) (7 vs. 10 days, P<0.01). Operative Time (OT) was significantly longer in the robotic group (350.5 vs. 208 min, P<0.01). No difference were observed between the two approaches regarding complications and oncological outcomes. Robotic approach induced lower bleeding and shorter LOS but required longer OT. This technique is feasible and safe for selected cases and experimented surgical teams. Complications rate and oncological outcomes are not different compared to standard open procedures.

914 - Robot assisted radical nephrectomy and inferior vena cava thrombectomy: Surgical technique, perioperative and oncologic outcomes

V48 - Robot assisted radical nephrectomy and inferior vena cava thrombectomy: Surgical technique, perioperative and oncologic outcomes

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) presents with inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombus in 10%-30% cases and surgical management forms the mainstay of the treatment. The objective of this study is to assess the outcomes of the patients undergoing radical nephrectomy with IVC thrombectomy. A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing open radical nephrectomy with IVC thrombectomy between 2006 till 2018 was done. A total of 56 patients were included. The mean (±standard deviation) age was 57.1 (±12.2) years. The number of patients with levels I, II, III, and IV thrombus were 4, 29,10, and 13, respectively. The mean blood loss was 1851.8 mL, and the mean operative time was 303.3 minutes. Overall, the complication rate was 51.7%, while the perioperative mortality rate was 8.9%. The mean duration of hospital stay was 10.6 ± 6.4 days. The majority of the patients had clear cell carcinoma (87.5%). There was a significant association between grade and stage of thrombus (P = 0.011). Using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the median overall survival (OS) was 75 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 43.5-106.5) months, and the median recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 48 (95% CI = 33.1-62.3) months. Age (P = 0.03), presence of systemic symptoms (P = 0.01), radiological size (P = 0.04), histopathological grade (P = 0.01), level of thrombus (P = 0.04), and invasion of thrombus into IVC wall (P = 0.01) were found to be significant predictors of OS. The management of RCC with IVC thrombus poses a major surgical challenge. Experience of a center along with high-volume and multidisciplinary facility particularly cardiothoracic facility provides better perioperative outcome. Though surgically challenging, it offers good overall-survival and recurrence-free survival.

Robot-assisted surgery is widely performed for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombi. Although many chemotherapeutic options are available for the treatment of unresectable RCC, there are very few reports on robot-assisted radical nephrectomy (RARN) with inferior vena cava thrombectomy (IVCT) after presurgical treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We believe that pre-surgical treatment can provide minimally invasive surgical benefits to high-risk patients during the perioperative period. A 77-year-old male with right RCC that invaded the IVC (cT3bN0M0, Mayo classification level III) underwent pembrolizumab and axitinib combination therapy because he had high surgical risk due to angina pectoris. The level of the tumor thrombus decreased from level III to II, and RARN with IVCT was then performed. Surgery was performed without complications, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day seven. The pathological diagnosis was clear cell RCC (ypT3b, G2). Adjuvant chemotherapy using pembrolizumab monotherapy is still ongoing. In this report, the inferior vena cave tumor thrombus level was down staged from level III to level II by treatment with pembrolizumab and axitinib. RARN with IVCT was safely performed without complication completely under robotic assistance.

Renal cell carcinoma is one common type of urologic cancers. It has tendencies to invade into the inferior vena cava (IVC) and usually requires an open surgery procedure. High rates of operative complications and mortality are usually associated with an open surgery procedure. The recently emerged robot-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (RAL-RN) and IVC tumor thrombectomy have shown to reduce operative related complications in patients with renal cell carcinoma.This case series study aimed to summarize technical utilization, perioperative outcomes, and efficacies of RAL-RN and IVC tumor thrombectomy in our hospital. A retrospective analysis was performed on clinical data from 20 patients who underwent RAL-RN and IVC tumor thrombectomy from January 2017 to December 2019 in our department.Patients had a median age of 59 years (interquartile range [IQR], 46–68). Four patients had renal neoplasm on left side and 16 on right side. Nineteen patients underwent RAL-RN (level 0: n = 2) or RAL-RN with IVC thrombectomy (n = 17) (level I: n = 3; level II: n = 12; and level III: n = 3) and 1 patient was converted into an open surgery. The median operative time was 328 minutes (IQR, 221–453). The estimated median blood loss was 500 mL (IQR, 200–1200). The median size of removed renal carcinoma was 67 cm2 (IQR, 40–91); the length of IVC tumor thrombus was 5 cm (IQR, 3–7). The postsurgery hospital length of stay was 6 days (IQR, 5–7). The complications included intestinal obstruction (n = 1), lymphatic fistula (n = 1), heart failure (n = 1), and low hemoglobin level (n = 1). The outcomes for patients after 16 months (IQR, 11–21) follow-up were tumor-free (n = 10), tumor progression (n = 4), loss of contact (n = 1), and death (n = 5).We concluded that RAL-RN and IVC thrombectomy renders good safety profiles including minimal invasiveness, low estimated median blood loss, short hospitalization, low morbidity, and quick renal function recovery. The long-term efficacy needs a further investigation.

V05-07 ROBOTIC-ASSISTED LEFT RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY AND IVC THROMBECTOMY IN CROSS-FUSED RENAL ECTOPIA

Robotic Left-sided Level II Caval Thrombectomy and Nephrectomy Using a Novel Supine, Single-dock Approach: Primary Description