Abstract

RNA–protein interactions are crucial for most biological processes in all organisms. However, it appears that the complexity of RNA-based regulation increases with the complexity of the organism, creating additional regulatory circuits, the scope of which is only now being revealed. It is becoming apparent that previously unappreciated features, such as disordered structural regions in proteins or non-coding regions in DNA leading to higher plasticity and pliability in RNA–protein complexes, are in fact essential for complex, precise and fine-tuned regulation. This review addresses the issue of the role of RNA–protein interactions in generating eukaryotic complexity, focusing on the newly characterized disordered RNA-binding motifs, moonlighting of metabolic enzymes, RNA-binding proteins interactions with different RNA species and their participation in regulatory networks of higher order.

Highlights

  • With the possible exception of the unestablished first stages in the evolution of life, RNA has always been accompanied by some proteins

  • The discovery of CRISPR– Cas9 RNA-guided interference shows that bacteria have at their disposal more sophisticated mechanisms involving RNA regulation employed in anti-phage defence [1]

  • In CUG-binding protein 2, which regulates the COX-2 transcript by binding to its 30 untranslated region (UTR), the RNA recognition motif (RRM) was shown to exist in distinct substates, enabling a conformational switch between low-affinity binding, associated with dynamic RNA scanning, and high-affinity binding with RNA target locking [31]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

With the possible exception of the unestablished first stages in the evolution of life, RNA has always been accompanied by some proteins. Structural disorder allows for more flexible and dynamic RNA binding, which contributes to the precision of the cellular response to stress and signalling These new findings suggest that there is a whole new avenue of research to explore and that the role of RBPs in generating complexity may have been underestimated. Since only about 1–2% of the human genome encodes proteins and as much as 83 –85% is transcribed [3], we have a large proportion of transcripts with unassigned functions, transcriptome ‘dark matter’ The functions of these ‘junk’ transcripts are quite diverse, but mostly associated with fine-tuning of expression, providing a plethora of regulatory mechanisms, including direct regulation of protein activity. We will focus on other types of RNA binding, which may be a critical factor in eukaryotic complexity

Intrinsically disordered RBDs
Disordered RNA-binding motifs
Disorder is important for the formation of RNA– protein functional units
Metabolic enzyme moonlighting: binary structural switch
Next tier of regulation
RBP binding to intronic sequences
RBP – lncRNA interactions regulate transcription
Eukaryotic regulatory networks
Conclusion
76. Zhou C et al 2017 LncRNA MEG3 downregulation
77. Liu B et al 2015 A cytoplasmic NF-kappaB
Findings
65. Fang S et al 2018 NONCODEV5: a comprehensive
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.