Abstract

Heart failure (HF) is a complex clinical syndrome in which structural/functional myocardial abnormalities result in symptoms and signs of hypoperfusion and/or pulmonary or systemic congestion at rest or during exercise. More than 80% of deaths in patients with HF recognize a cardiovascular cause, with most being either sudden cardiac death (SCD) or death caused by progressive pump failure. Risk stratification of SCD in patients with HF and preserved (HFpEF) or reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) represents a clinical challenge. This review will give an update of current strategies for SCD risk stratification in both HFrEF and HFpEF.

Highlights

  • Heart failure (HF) is a complex clinical syndrome in which structural/functional myocardial abnormalities result in symptoms and signs of hypoperfusion and/or pulmonary or systemic congestion at rest or during exercise [1].Currently, 5.7 million people in the United States have HF, and approximately 45% of them have systolic dysfunction [2]

  • In patients with ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, a reduction of global longitudinal strain (GLS) has been independently associated with sudden cardiac death (SCD), appropriate ICD therapy, and ventricular arrhythmias [35], Haugaa et al have showed, in an observational study including 94 patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy [36], that an increase of GLS it is associated with a high risk of arrhythmic events

  • Microvolt T-wave alternans (MTWA) is a beat-to-beat fluctuation of T-wave amplitude and morphology, that has been associated with increased susceptibility for sustained ventricular arrhythmia [68], early studies showed that TWA was a powerful electrocardiographic tool in predicting SCD in patients, in cohorts with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy [69,70]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Heart failure (HF) is a complex clinical syndrome in which structural/functional myocardial abnormalities result in symptoms and signs of hypoperfusion and/or pulmonary or systemic congestion at rest or during exercise [1]. In patients with systolic dysfunction after a myocardial infarction, non-arrhythmic SCD frequently occurs during the first four to six weeks and is due to mechanical complication of myocardial infarction (i.e., rupture of the left ventricular free wall; rupture of the interventricular septum; and the development of acute mitral regurgitation) [19]. It seems that the proportions of arrhythmic and non-arrhythmic SCD cases become equivalent approximately one month after the acute coronary syndrome. Irrespective of HF etiology and LVEF, in patients with advanced HF, arrhythmias are triggered primarily by pump failure with about 60% of such patients that have severe bradyarrhythmias or electromechanical dissociation as the underlying cause for their SCD [27]

Risk Stratification of SCD in HFrEF
Cardiac Imaging
Speckle Echocardiography
Myocardial Sympathetic Innervation Imaging
Resting ECG
Ambulatory Electrocardiogram
Autonomic Function Test
Microvolt T wave Alternans
Signal-Averaged Electrocardiography
Electrophysiologic Study
Biomarkers
Genetics and Genomics
10. Artificial intelligence and machine learning
11. Risk stratification of SCD in HFpEF
Findings
12. Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.