Risk Factors and Features of Critically Ill Patients with Deep Vein Thrombosis in Lower Extremities

Background:The study aimed to predict the risk factors of deep vein thrombosis of lower extremity after traumatic fracture of lower extremity, so as to apply effective strategies to prevent deep vein thrombosis of lower extremity, improve survival rate, and reduce medical cost.Methods:The English and Chinese literatures published from January 2005 to November 2023 were extracted from PubMed, Embase, Willey Library, Scopus, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata/SE 16.0 software.Results:A total of 13 articles were included in this paper, including 2699 venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients and 130,507 normal controls. According to the meta-results, 5 independent risk factors can be identified: history of VTE was the most significant risk factor for deep vein thrombosis after traumatic lower extremity fracture (risk ratio [RR] = 6.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.64–11.26); age (≥60) was the risk factor for deep vein thrombosis after traumatic lower extremity fracture (RR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.02–2.18); long-term braking was a risk factor for deep vein thrombosis after traumatic lower extremity fracture (RR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.11–1.93); heart failure was a risk factor for deep vein thrombosis after traumatic lower extremity fracture (RR = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.51–2.33); obesity was a risk factor for deep vein thrombosis after traumatic lower extremity fracture (RR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.35–1.83).Conclusion:The study confirmed that the history of deep vein thrombosis, age (60 + years), previous history of VTE, obesity, prolonged bed rest, and heart failure are all associated with an increased risk of VTE. By identifying these significant risk factors, we can more intensively treat patients at relatively high risk of VTE, thereby reducing the incidence of VTE. However, the limitation of the study is that the sample may not be diversified enough, and it fails to cover all potential risk factors, which may affect the universal applicability of the results. Future research should include a wider population and consider more variables in order to obtain a more comprehensive risk assessment.

To investigate the effect of different use time of intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) on the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of lower extremities after arthroplasty. Between October 2018 and February 2019, 94 patients who planned to undergo unilateral total hip or knee arthroplsty and met the selection criteria were randomly divided into a control group (47 cases) and a trial group (47 cases). There was no significant difference in gender, age, surgical site, and surgical reason between the two groups ( P>0.05). After returning to the ward, all patients were treated with IPC. And the IPC was used until 9:00 pm on the day after operation in the trial group and until 8:00 am the next day after operation in the control group. The levels of hemoglobin, platelet count, D-dimer, hospital stay, treatment costs, patients' satisfaction with IPC, the parameters of thromboelastrography [kinetics (K value), freezing angle (α angle), reaction time (R value), maximum amplitude (MA value)], visual analogue scale (VAS) score, circumference difference of calf before and after operation, Pittsburgh sleep assessment score, and the incidence of DVT of lower limbs were recorded and compared between the two groups. The K value and D-dimer before operation were significant different between the two groups ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in pre- and post-operative hemoglobin, platelet count, and the other parameters of thromboelastography between the two groups ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in pre- and post-operative VAS scores and post-operative circumference difference of calf between the two groups ( P>0.05). The sleep assessment score of the trial group at 1 day after operation was significant lower than that of the control group ( t=2.107, P=0.038). There was no significant difference in the hospital stay and treatment costs between the two groups ( P>0.05). There was 1 case (2.1%) of DVT, 3 cases (6.4%) of intermuscular venous thrombosis, and 1 case (2.1%) of infection in the trial group, and 2 cases (4.3%), 4 cases (8.5%), and 0 (0) in the control group. The differences were not significant ( P>0.05). After the completion of postoperative IPC treatment, the satisfaction rates of using IPC were 89.4%(42/47) in the trial group and 70.2% (33/47) in the control group, and the difference was not significant ( χ 2=0.097, P=0.104). IPC using for a short period of time after arthroplasty do not increase the degrees of the pain and the swelling of calf; it can effectively prevent DVT of the lower extremity, improve the quality of sleep in patients, and is good for the limbs rehabilitation.

A background of Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) indicates a progressive elevation of pulmonary vascular resistance, leading to overfilling, elevation of venous pressure, congestion in various organs, and edema in the venous system. This study aimed to investigate whether PH is a risk factor for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower extremities after hip and knee replacement surgery. A total of 238 patients who received joint replacement of lower extremities in our department of orthopedics from January 2009 to January 2012 were examined by echocardiography and Color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) of the lower extremities. Based on pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), the patients were divided into a normal PAP group (n=214) and PH group (n=24). All the patients were re-examined by CDFI during post-operative care. Among the 238 patients, 18 had DVT in the lower extremities after the operation. DVT total incidence rate was 7.56% (18/238). In the PH group, 11 patients had DVT (45.83%, 11/24), but in the normal PAP group, only 7 had DVT (3.27%, 7/214). The incidence of DVT was significantly lower in the normal PAP group than in the PH group (P<0.01). In addition, there was a positive correlation between PAP and the incidence of DVT. PH could be a high-risk factor for the occurrence of DVT in patient's lower extremities after joint replacement surgeries.

AimIn this study, we aimed to analyze the genetic and acquired risk factors for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower extremities among Sudanese women.MethodsA total of 136 women were enrolled in the study, including 75 DVT patients and 61 healthy controls. Demographic and clinical data were collected using a specific questionnaire. Citrated blood samples of patients and controls were used for coagulation assays, and DNAs isolated from EDTA-blood samples were used for the detection of Factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations using multiplex polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis.ResultsBoth gene mutations were found to be absent from all 136 subjects, and therefore did not account for the incidence of DVT in Sudanese women. Of the 75 DVTs, 70 (93.3%) were localized in the left leg and 5 (6.7%) in the right leg. Additionally, 84% of the DVTs were proximal and 16% were distal. Among the 75 patients, 22 (29.33%) were postpartum, 7 (9.33%) were pregnant, and 46 (61.33%) were nonpregnant. Levels of prothrombin fragment 1+2, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and D-dimer were significantly higher in DVT patients than in healthy controls (P<0.0001).ConclusionRisk factors that most significantly affected patients in the 18–45 years age group were pregnancy and oral contraceptive usage, whereas those that most significantly affected patients in the 66–90 years age group were immobility, heart disease, and history of DVT.

Risk factors associated with deep venous thrombosis in patients with different bed-rest durations: A multi-institutional case-control study

PurposeTo determine the incidence and risk factors of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of lower extremities at admission in elderly Chinese patients with femoral neck fracture, and to establish and evaluate a new DVT predictor based on these risk factors.MethodsPatients who were hospitalized from January 2018 to December 2020 at three independent centers were reviewed. According to the results of lower extremities vascular ultrasound at admission, they were divided into DVT group and non-DVT group. Single and multivariate logistic regression analysis were applied to identify independent risk factors for DVT occurrence, and then a prediction formula for DVT based on the risk factors was developed. The new predictive index of DVT was calculated by the formula. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the diagnostic value of different factors and the new predictive index.ResultsThere were 203 elder patients were included in the final analysis after application of the exclusion criteria. Thirty seven patients (18.2%) were diagnosed as DVT by ultrasound, including 33 patients (89.2%) of peripheral type, 1 patient (2.7%) of central type and 3 patients (8.1%) of mixed type.Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that four factors including injured side, hemoglobin, fibrinogen, d-dimer were the independent risk factors for the incidence of DVT. On this basis, a new formula for DVT predictive factor was constructed: New predictive index = 0.895 * injured side (right = 1, left = 0) + 0.899 * hemoglobin (<109.5 g/L = 1, > 109.5 g/L = 0) + 1.19 * fibrinogen (>4.24 g/L = 1, < 4.24 g/L = 0) + 1.221* d-dimer (>2.4 mg/L = 1, < 2.4 mg/L = 0). The AUC value of this new developed index was 0.735.ConclusionsThis work showed that the incidence of DVT in elderly patients with femoral neck fracture in China was high at admission. New DVT predictive value can be used as an effective diagnosis strategy for evaluation of thrombosis at admission.

To investigate how many critically ill patients developed deep vein thrombosis (DVT) during their admission to intensive care units (ICU) and to compare the characteristics of patients with and without deep vein thrombosis. Critically ill patients are a high-risk group for deep vein thrombosis because they typically have multiple risk factors, such as prolonged immobility, mechanical ventilation and old age. A prospective observational study was employed. The subjects were 90 patients who were older than 18 years of age, who were admitted to an intensive care unit for more than five days and were not provided any prophylactic measures. Data were collected at a university hospital for five months. A duplex scan was performed on day 2.4 on average and repeated between days 5-7 to diagnose deep vein thrombosis. The iliac, femoral, popliteal and tibial veins were examined by compression and colour Doppler methods of the duplex scan by one technician. Age, gender and body mass index were significant factors for deep vein thrombosis development (p < 0.05). Ten patients (11.1%) developed deep vein thrombosis during their stay in the intensive care units. The incidence was lower than in Western studies in which patients were not provided prophylaxis, but may increase with an extended observation period as in previous studies. The results of this study could allow ICU nurses to recognise the DVT incidence in critically ill patients. This result could lead to more active prevention and monitoring of DVT by ICU nurses, especially for high-risk patients, such as older or obese patients.

To assess the performance of magnetic resonance venography (MRV) for pelvis and deep vein thrombosis in the lower extremities before surgical interventions for varicose veins. We enrolled 72 patients who underwent MRV and ultrasonography before stripping for varicose veins of lower extremities. All images of the deep venous systems were evaluated by time-of-flight MRV. Forty-six patients (63.9%) of all were female. Mean age was 65.2 ± 10.2 years (37-81 years). There were forty patients (55.6%) with varicose veins in both legs. Two deep vein thrombosis (2.8%) and three iliac vein thrombosis (4.2%) were diagnosed. All patients without deep vein thrombosis underwent the stripping of saphenous veins, and post-thrombotic change was avoided in all cases. MRV, without contrast medium, is considered clinically useful for the lower extremity venous system.

Venous thromboembolism, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is typically reported as a composite measure of the quality of trauma center care. Given that recent data suggesting postinjury DVT and PE are distinct clinical processes, a better understanding may result from analyzing them as independent, competing events. Using competing risks analysis, we evaluated our hypothesis that the risk factors and timing of postinjury DVT and PE are different. We examined all adult trauma patients admitted to our Level I trauma center from July 2006 to December 2011 who received at least one surveillance duplex ultrasound of the lower extremities and who were at high risk or greater for DVT. Outcomes included DVT and PE events, and time-to-event from admission. We used competing risks analysis to evaluate risk factors for DVT while accounting for PE as a competing event, and vice versa. Of 2,370 patients, 265 (11.2%) had at least one venous thromboembolism event, 235 DVT only, 19 PE only, 11 DVT and PE. Within 2 days of admission, 38% of DVT cases had occurred compared with 26% of PE. Competing risks modeling of DVT as primary event identified older age, severe injury (Injury Severity Score, ≥ 15), mechanical ventilation longer than 4 days, active cancer, history of DVT or PE, major venous repair, male sex, and prophylactic enoxaparin and prophylactic heparin as associated risk factors. Modeling of PE as the primary event showed younger age, nonsevere injury (Injury Severity Score, < 15), central line placement, and prophylactic heparin as relevant factors. The risk factors for PE and DVT after injury were different, suggesting that they are clinically distinct events that merit independent consideration. Many DVT events occurred early despite prophylaxis, bringing into question the preventability of postinjury DVT. We recommend trauma center quality reporting program measures be revised to account for DVT and PE as unique events. Epidemiologic, level III.

Preoperative risk factors for deep vein thrombosis in knee osteoarthritis patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty

A prospective study comparing duplex scan and venography for diagnosis of lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis

This study was designed to compare duplex scanning with contrast venography for the diagnosis of acute deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity, both at the femoropopliteal (above-knee) and tibioperoneal (below-knee) levels. A total of 216 patients with 220 limbs suspected of acute deep vein thrombosis underwent duplex scanning followed within 24 h by ascending venography. The two studies were interpreted independently by two physicians who were blinded to the results of the corresponding alternative study. Venography was positive for deep vein thrombosis in 44.5% of cases (98/220). Duplex scanning was inadequate at the above-knee level in two cases (0.9%) and at the below-knee level in 17 cases (7.7%). Sensitivity and specificity of duplex scanning at above-knee level were 98.7% and 100% respectively while corresponding values were 85.2% and 99.2% at below-knee level. By excluding technically inadequate duplex studies, the sensitivity at below-knee level was clearly improved (93.8%). It is concluded that with meticulous technique, duplex scanning is highly accurate in diagnosing acute deep vein thrombosis of symptomatic lower extremities, avoiding contrast venography in over 90% of the cases, even at the tibioperoneal level.

ObjectiveClinical characteristics, anticoagulant protocols, and risk factors of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients with femoral and pelvic fractures were analyzed throughout the perioperative period to provide references for early identification and optimization of risk factors.MethodsThis was a retrospective study. A total of 569 patients undergoing surgery of femoral and pelvic fractures from May 2018 to December 2019 were included.The clinical data including general conditions, trauma, surgery, anticoagulant protocols, and laboratory indexes were collected. According to the results of deep vein Doppler ultrasonography of the lower extremities, the patients were divided into non-DVT group and DVT group. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to identify the independent risk factors of preoperative and postoperative DVT.ResultsThe incidence of DVT was 40.25% and preoperative DVT was 26.71%, which was higher than the incidence of postoperative DVT of 17.22%. Most of them were thrombus on the affected side (60.26%) and distal thrombus (81.66%). The average time of DVT formation was 6.55 ± 0.47 days after trauma and 6.67 ± 0.48 days after surgery. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anemia, hypoproteinemia, non-anticoagulation before surgery, delayed anticoagulation after trauma and admission, high-energy trauma, multiple injuries, drinking history, and advanced age were independent risk factors for perioperative DVT. The increased level of fibrinogen degradation products was an independent risk factor for preoperative DVT. These risk factors were identified to be independently associated with postoperative DVT, including intraoperative blood transfusion, postoperative blood transfusion, pulmonary infection, preoperative non-anticoagulation, postoperative delayed anticoagulation, preoperative waiting time > 7 days, operative time > 2 h, c-reactive protein, fibrinogen level, platelet count 1 day after surgery, c-reactive protein, fibrinogen, and hemoglobin levels 3 days after surgery, comminuted fracture.ConclusionsAt present, anticoagulation and other DVT prevention and treatment programs have not changed the current situation that the incidence of DVT is still high. Through the analysis of the risk factors of DVT throughout the perioperative period, optimizing the perioperative blood transfusion, preoperative lung disease, hypoproteinemia, anemia, inflammation, etc., and surgery as soon as possible after trauma may further reduce its incidence.

To examine the incidence of and risk factors for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) among different types of osteotomies around the knee. It was hypothesized that DVT would be detected at a substantial rate after the osteotomy, and there would be differences in the incidences among the different osteotomy procedures. Consecutive patients who underwent knee osteotomies for varus osteoarthritis and met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Ultrasonographic evaluation was performed to detect DVT on bilateral whole leg at 1month before and 7days after surgery. Statistical comparison of the demographic and clinical parameters between the patients with and without DVT as well as multivariate analysis using logistic regression was conducted to identify risk factors related to the incidence of postoperative DVT. The study subjects comprised 159 knees in 135 patients with medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOW-HTO), 93 knees in 78 patients with lateral closed wedge high tibial osteotomy (LCW-HTO), and 74 knees in 54 patients with double level osteotomy (DLO). In the postoperative evaluation, DVT was detected in 19 of 159 knees (11.9%) in MOW-HTO, 21 of 93 knees (22.6%) in LCW-HTO, and 5 of 74 knees (6.8%) in DLO. The incidence of DVT was significantly higher after LCW-HTO than after MOW-HTO and DLO (p < 0.01). DVT at a level above the knee was noted in one case after MOW-HTO, while DVT in the remaining cases developed at a level below the knee. No cases of symptomatic pulmonary embolism were encountered during the study period. Among the potential risk factors assessed for correlation with the incidence of DVT, LCW-HTO was identified as a significant risk factor (odds ratio: 2.54; 95% CI 1.334-4.836; p < 0.01). This study demonstrated that DVT occurred at a substantial rate (overall incidence of 13.8%) after osteotomy around the knee even with the use of prophylactic anticoagulant. Among the different osteotomy types, the DVT rate was significantly higher after LCW-HTO than after MOW-HTO and DLO. Prospectively designed observational cohort study, Level III.

Background Breast reconstruction is associated with multiple risk factors for venous thromboembolism. However, the incidence of deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing breast reconstruction is uncertain. Objective The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the incidence of deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing breast reconstruction using autologous tissue transfer and to identify potential risk factors for deep vein thrombosis. Methods Thirty-five patients undergoing breast reconstruction were enrolled. We measured patients' preoperative characteristics including age, body mass index (kg/m2), and risk factors for deep vein thrombosis. The preoperative diameter of each venous segment in the deep veins was measured using duplex ultrasound. All patients received intermittent pneumatic pump and elastic compression stockings for postoperative thromboprophylaxis. Results Among the 35 patients evaluated, 11 (31.4%) were found to have deep vein thrombosis postoperatively, and one patient was found to have pulmonary embolism postoperatively. All instances of deep vein thrombosis developed in the calf and were asymptomatic. Ten of 11 patients underwent free flap transfer, and the remaining one patient received a latissimus dorsi pedicled flap. Deep vein thrombosis incidence did not significantly differ between patients with a free flap or pedicled flap (P = 0.13). Documented risk factors for deep vein thrombosis demonstrated no significant differences between patients with and without deep vein thrombosis. The diameter of the common femoral vein was significantly larger in patients who developed postoperative deep vein thrombosis than in those who did not ( P < 0.05). Conclusions The morbidity of deep vein thrombosis in patients who underwent breast reconstruction using autologous tissue transfer was relatively high. Since only the diameter of the common femoral vein was predictive of developing postoperative deep vein thrombosis, postoperative pharmacological thromboprophylaxis should be considered for all patients undergoing breast reconstruction regardless of operative procedure.