Abstract

Heavy and long tails of loss distributions, an extremely high confidence level and parameter-estimation-based measurement techniques can lead to measurement errors in the calculation of capital reserve for external risks faced by financial institutions. However, studies on the connectedness between the capital reserve and the measurement uncertainty are surprisingly sparse. Our paper attempts to simultaneously quantify single operational losses using a general convolution approach and compute the precision of the quantification output using an error propagation theory. By linking these two models up, we find a nonmonotonic and uncertain relationship between the risk capital estimate and its precision, with exact patterns determined by a set of characteristic parameters of the loss distributions chosen. Such patterns are substantiated by the empirical evidence from the literature. This paper provides a rationale for adopting quantitative buffer capital, designed to absorb variations due to measurement errors, especially those originating from the estimation risk.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.