Review and Inventory of Pedological and Stratigraphical Knowledge for Investigating Shallow Landslides: A Case Study of the Cervinara Area (Central Campanian Apennines, Southern Italy)

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

Landslides are one of the most serious problems affecting large parts of the world. There are two approaches that are used to study the organization of these land cover features: firstly, an approach utilizing lithostratigraphic tools, where soils are described and interpreted in accordance with specific geological/lithological patterns, and, secondly, through pedological instruments, where the pedogenetic patterns are identified, and the sequences are identified via standardized criteria and organized according to modern classification systems. In the present review, a comparison between the two above approaches is outlined, using the Campania Apennine reliefs (Southern Italy) as the reference environment because they are periodically and dramatically affected by mass movements mainly associated with rainfall events. These reliefs are strongly influenced by the products emitted by the Phlegraean Fields and the Somma–Vesuvius volcanoes. These products affect surface structures either through their direct alteration, with the formation of pedogenized products, or through their reworking, mainly stimulated by rainfall events, which is also responsible for the movement of pedogenized materials along the slopes. This results in complex surface architectures, knowledge of which is a crucial step in the assessment of robust monitoring systems. This review covers the Cervinara area, located in the central portion of the Campania Apennines, which was overwhelmed by dramatic landslide events in 1999. Our aims were to critically analyze the impact and the potential of lithostratigraphic and pedological approaches in studying the soils of the area in question and to provide an inventory of the scientific papers in which, with different aims, descriptions and interpretations of the local soil covers are reported. We examined and selected the national and international literature available in major scientific online databases, and these were split into groups on the basis of citations and type of approach. The reviewed literature showed that the stratigraphic approach was by far the most preferred, although significant potential was offered by pedological tools in this field of investigation. A high number of hydraulic and geotechnical articles was also found, in comparison to geological and pedological papers, which confirmed the significant levels of interest in the land cover type in question, specifically regarding landslide processes, and in their role in risk mitigation practices. On the whole, the latter approach has been proven to offer a greater exploration potential through the use of rigorous classification systems and, thus, the possibility of identifying and correlating soil properties over large areas.