Abstract

The electrochemical performance of alternative anode materials for Li-ion batteries is often measured using composite electrodes consisting of active material and conductive carbon additives. Cycling of these composite electrodes at low voltages demonstrates charge storage at the operating potentials of viable anodes, however, the conductive carbon additive is also able to store charge in the low potential regime. The contribution of the conductive carbon additives to the observed capacity is often neglected when interpreting the electrochemical performance of electrodes. To provide a reference for the contribution of the carbons to the observed capacity, we report the charge storage behavior of two common conductive carbon additives Super P and Ketjenblack as a function of voltage, rate, and electrolyte composition. Both carbons exhibit substantial capacities after 100 cycles, up to 150 mAh g−1, when cycled to 10 mV. The capacity is dependent on the discharge cutoff voltage and cycling rate with some dependence on electrolyte composition. The first few cycles are dominated by the formation of the SEI followed by a fade to a steady, reversible capacity thereafter. Neglecting the capacity of the carbon additive can lead to significant errors in the estimation of charge storage capabilities of the active material.

Highlights

  • Reversible Capacity of Conductive Carbon Additives at Low Potentials: Caveats for Testing Alternative Anode Materials for Li-Ion Batteries

  • The investigation of alternative anode materials for Li batteries is driven by the need for sustainable materials exhibiting high, reversible capacity at low voltages that outperform the current ubiquitous anode chemistry provided by Li intercalated graphite

  • The goal of this study is to provide an estimate of the reversible capacity expected for two common carbon additives when cycled at low potentials in a variety of electrolytes at several rates

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Reversible Capacity of Conductive Carbon Additives at Low Potentials: Caveats for Testing Alternative Anode Materials for Li-Ion Batteries. The Li-ion battery is currently capacity limited by the cathode, next-generation cathodes such as elemental S8, for example, have high theoretical capacities, up to five times higher than the conventional lithiated graphite anode. Due to this capacity mismatch, Li-S cells rely on the use of unsafe Li metal anodes that add significant challenges to the already complicated cathode chemistry to achieve high energy densities. Situations in which carbons could contribute significant capacities relative to the active material include electrode slurries that contain a large

Objectives
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.