Reverse Needle Driving via Umbilical Trocar: An Effective Technique for Treating Recto-Bulbar Urethral Fistula in Laparoscopically Assisted Anorectoplasty.

BackgroundImage-guided surgery with an open magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system is applied for brain tumors in the neurosurgery field, but has rarely been reported in pediatric surgery. We report our initial experience of intraoperative confirmation of precision rectal pull-through during laparoscopically assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) in an open MRI operating theater for pediatric patients with anorectal malformation (ARM).Case presentationA 3.0 kg term male neonate was delivered with anorectal malformation. An invertogram revealed the intermediate type. Transverse colostomy was made on the left upper abdomen. The recto-bulbar urethral fistula (RBUF) was diagnosed by a distal colostogram and voiding cystourethrogram. LAARP was planned at 6 months of age. Because this was the first procedure in which the pediatric abdomen had been scanned in an open MRI operating theater in our institution, we scanned his pelvic floor under sedation 3 weeks before the operation using the open MRI system in our operation room. We performed the operation with 4 trocars. The peritoneal reflection was carefully incised and the rectum was dissected. The RBUF was resected. The center of the muscle complex was detected at the perineal skin with an electrical nerve stimulator, and a 7-mm longitudinal skin incision was made on the perineal lesion for anoplasty. The muscle complex and the pubo-rectal sling were confirmed laparoscopically using a 3.5-mm bipolar forceps connected to the electrical nerve stimulator. Anoplasty was performed between the rectal stump and perineal skin. After anoplasty, the patient was scanned with open MRI under general anesthesia. We attached the quadrature-detection (QD) head coil around the patient’s pelvis and inserted him in the gantry. A 0.45-T open MRI clearly revealed that the pulled through rectum was located in the center of the muscle complex on T2-weighted images. The postoperative course was uneventful. Oral intake was started on post-operative day 1. Postoperative dynamic urography showed no complication (e.g., leakage or residual fistula).ConclusionsWe successfully performed LAARP for ARM, with intraoperative confirmation of precision rectal pull-through in an open MRI operating theater. Further cases are required to evaluate the application of open MRI systems in pediatric surgery.

Laparoscopically assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) for recto-bulbar urethral fistula (RBUF) is not now a standard operation due to urethra injury risk and incomplete removal of fistula. Our approach is a novel and secure technique of trans-perineal transection using a 5-mm stapler for RBUF. Before performing LAARP, the orifice of RBUF was confirmed under flexible cystoscope inspection. Before transection of RBUF, the center of the muscle complex was detected at perineal skin. The muscle complex and the pubo-rectal sling were then also confirmed with electrical nerve stimulator under laparoscopic approach. A 5-mm trocar was inserted to pass through the center of the muscle complex from perineal incision of the neo-anus. RBUF was stapled and transected using a 5-mm stapler inserted from the neo-anus. The operator successfully confirmed complete adequate closure of RBUF under flexible cystoscope inspection. A 5-mm stapler was effective and useful for the transection of RBUF.

It has long been considered surgical dogma that the length of the shared common wall (CW) between a fistula and the urethra in males with anorectal malformation (ARM) and rectourethral bulbar fistula (RUBF) is considerably longer than in males with ARM and rectourethral prostatic fistula (RUPF). This belief has led surgeons who perform laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) for RUPF to avoid LAARP for RUBF for risk of potential injury to the urethra or incomplete removal of the fistula. In this study, we compared CW between RUBF and RUPF using distal colostography (DCG) and direct intraoperative measurements. DCG of rectourethral fistula patients (n = 63; RUBF: n = 44; RUPF: n = 19) were used to measure CW retrospectively. Results were expressed as a ratio of the height of L4; i.e., CW:L4. If less than 0.7, the CW was classified as being "short"; if 0.71-1.4, as being "medium"; and if greater than 1.41, as being "long". CW that could not be measured was classified as indeterminate. 24 of these patients also had CW measured intraoperatively during LAARP as previously described. The results obtained using both techniques were also compared. Surprisingly, CW:L4 in RUBF patients was short in 47.7%, medium in 27.3%, long in 20.5%, and indeterminate in 4.5% on DCG, equivalent to mean lengths of 7mm, 8.5mm, and 10.3mm obtained using direct intraoperative measurement for short, medium, and long CW:L4 categories, respectively. CW:L4 in RUPF was short in 73.6%, medium in 10.5%, and long in 5.2% on DCG, while mean intraoperative measurements were 5mm, 7mm, and 10mm, respectively. Differences in CW measured intraoperatively were not significantly different between RUBF and RUPF (p = NS). From our findings, 47.7% of CWs in RUBF were short using two independent methods, with only 20.5% being long. Thus, LAARP should be considered actively for treating selected RUBF cases and not be excluded on the basis of CW length.

In this study, we used a near-infrared ray catheter (NIRC) to visualize the urethral line. We herein report our intraoperative visualization technique of the urethra using an illuminating catheter in laparoscopy-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) for imperforated anus. A 3.0-kg term male neonate with anorectal malformation was delivered. An invertogram revealed the type as intermediate. Transverse colostomy was performed at the left upper abdomen. A recto-bulbar urethral fistula (RBUF) was diagnosed via distal colostogram and voiding cystourethrogram. LAARP was planned at 6 months of age. We performed the operation with four trocars. A 45° 5-mm scope was used to clearly view the deep pelvic space. Before starting rectal dissection, a 6-Fr pig-tail-type NIRC was inserted through the external opening of the urethra to visualize the urethra during the laparoscopic procedure. The catheter tip was placed in the bladder, and excretion of urine was maintained through the NIRC during the procedures. While dissecting the deep pelvic space between the posterior wall of the urethra and anterior wall of the rectum, the exact line of the urethra was clearly confirmed by overlay images of the NIRC. The RBUF was dissected safely using this innovative image-guided technique. Anoplasty was performed between the rectal stump and perineal skin. The postoperative course was uneventful. Oral intake was started on postoperative day 1. Postoperative dynamic urography showed no complications. An NIRC is useful for detecting the urethra during LAARP.

Functional Outcome in Patients With Anorectal Malformation With Recto-prostatic or Recto-bulbar Urethral Fistula and Comparison Between Different Surgical Approaches: A Multi-center Study

Congenital recto-urethral fistula (RUF) is the most common form of anorectal malformations (ARMs) found in boys. The aim of this study is to review our experience with one-stage laparoscopic procedure in the management of ARMs with recto-prostatic fistula and recto-bulbar fistula. Seventeen boys with congenital RUF who underwent one-stage laparoscopy-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) between July 2012 and June 2015 were retrospectively in the study. All patients successfully underwent one-staged laparoscopic surgery without conversion. The recto-prostatic urethral fistula was encountered in 6 patients and recto-urethral bulbar fistula in 11 patients. The mean age at the time of surgery was 46.2 hours with mean length of hospital stay being 10.6 days. The operative times for the recto-urethral prostatic fistula and recto-urethral bulbar fistula were similar (128.2 versus 122.4 minutes, P = .091). Intraoperative blood loss was minimal. No injury to the urethra or vas deferens. The urethral catheter was removed on postoperative day 10. No one lost to follow-up. The median follow-up period was 2.6 years (range: 2-4 years). No recurrent fistula or urethral diverticulum was detected according to the voiding cystourethrography and pelvic MRI at 1 year. One-stage LAARP is safe and effective for neonates with recto-prostatic fistula and recto-bulbar fistula. It provides an alternative method to rectify the ARMs with recto-prostatic fistula and recto-bulbar fistula without colostomy.

Introduction: Laparoscopically assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) was introduced in 2000,1 and the number of hospitals adopting it for the treatment of high-type anorectal malformation (rectovesical or rectoprostatic fistula) is increasing. However, the application of LAARP for rectobulbar urethral fistula is controversial because precise division of the fistula in the deep pelvic cavity is difficult, and there is a potential risk of posterior urethral diverticulum.2–4 In this video, we introduce a novel procedure for an imperforate anus with a rectobulbar fistula involving precise ligation of the fistula and appropriate placement of the rectum in the center of the sphincter using combined laparoscopically assisted and anterior sagittal approaches. Case Report: A boy weighing 2220 g was born at a gestational age of 37 weeks and diagnosed with an imperforate anus immediately after birth. No associated malformations, including neurological abnormalities and sacral deformities, were noted. Initially, a...

A new approach for persistent cloaca: Laparoscopically assisted anorectoplasty and modified repair of urogenital sinus

Posterior or anterior sagittal anorectoplasty (ASARP) is the mainstream for correcting rectovestibular fistula (RVF). However, the intermediate RVF has the potential risk of wound complications when applying ASARP due to its high rectal pouch, long fistula tract, and difficulty separating the rectum and vagina. We developed laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) for surgical correction of RVF, which has acceptable preliminary outcomes. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of LAARP in comparison with ASARP for patients with RVF. Twenty-five patients with RVF who underwent LAARP between October 2017 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The outcomes were compared with 43 patients who underwent ASARP between April 2015 and August 2018. The age, weight at operation, sacral ratio, operative time, and postoperative hospital stay were evaluated. The results were assessed for complications, perineum appearance, and bowel function. The two groups were comparable in terms of demographics. The median operative time of the LAARP group was significantly longer than that of the ASARP group (113 vs. 95 minutes; p = 0.015). The mean length of the resected rectum in the LAARP group was also longer than that in the ASARP group (6.75 ± 5.07 vs. 3.31 ± 3.06 cm; p = 0.001). Compared with the LAARP group, complications in the ASARP group were more frequent (4.0 vs. 27.9%, p = 0.036). No intraoperative or postoperative wound-related complications occurred in the LAARP group. However, in the ASARP group, one patient had an intraoperative vaginal injury and four had postoperative anastomosis-related complications. The incidence of redo operation in the ASARP group was significantly higher than that in the LAARP group (p = 0.000). Cosmetic satisfaction was higher in the LAARP group (96.0 vs. 76.7%; p < 0.05). In terms of voluntary bowel movement, soiling, and constipation, the LAARP group had similar results compare with the ASARP group. The LAARP technique has shown several unique strengths in treating intermediate type RVF, including lower risks of complications, and minimal muscular injury, with a comparable bowel function.

Laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) is considered to benefit the male patients with anorectal malformation (ARM). This study evaluates LAARP management for intermediate type rectovestibular fistula (IRVF) in the female patient with ARM. Twelve patients with IRVF (aged 3-5months) underwent LAARP from 2017 to 2019 in our institute. LAARP was performed for mobilization of the rectum, visualization and enlargement of the center of the sphincter muscle complex (SMC) from pelvic and perineal aspects, intra-fistula mucosectomy and rectal pull-through in the SMC with the fourchette and the perineal body unattached. LARRP was performed in all patients without conversion to open procedure. No patient suffered from wound infection, vaginal injury, recurrent fistula and anal stenosis. The parents were satisfied with the appearance of the wound. Rectal prolapse developed in one patient and needed surgical correction. The patients were followed up for a mean of 19.7months (ranged from 12 to 35months). Our preliminary experience shows that LAARP offers an alternative method of correction for the IRVF with good visualization of the SMC and may diminish the risks of wound dehiscence and vaginal injury.

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery has gained increasing attention due to its potential to improve the benefits of laparoscopic surgery. However, the technique remains technically challenging for most surgeons. We developed a new technique utilizing a needle grasper held in the surgeon's left hand as an alternative to conventional single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC). From August 2011 through May 2013, 29 patients at Nippon Medical School Musashi Kosugi Hospital, with gallbladder stones or polyps underwent single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) with an additional needle grasper that was held in the surgeon's left hand (SILCAN) and introduced in the right subcostal region without a trocar. We analyzed intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of 29 patients for whom SILCAN was performed and retrospectively compared these outcomes to those of 32 patients who underwent conventional 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) from January 2011 through May 2013. No differences in patient characteristics or intraoperative/postoperative outcomes were observed between the groups. None of the patients in either group required conversion to an open procedure or additional ports. In the SILCAN group, no patients had complications within the first 4 weeks after surgery, with the exception of 1 patient with severe chronic cholecystitis in whom bile duct stenosis developed due to inadvertent clipping of the common hepatic duct. The frequency of postoperative analgesic use was similar in both groups, although none of the patients in the SILCAN group received analgesics for pain from the small, inconspicuous wound in the right subcostal region. SILCAN is a safe and feasible alternative to SILC which does not compromise the qualities of CLC. It is less technically challenging, and postoperative pain and cosmesis are comparable to those of conventional SILC.

Management of anorectal malformation without ligation of fistula: An approach preventing posterior urethral diverticula

ABSTRACTBackground: The anorectal anomalies consist in a complex group of birth defects. Laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty improved visualization of the rectal fistula and the ability to place the pull-through segment within the elevator muscle complex with minimal dissection. There is no consensus on how the fistula should be managed. Aim: To evaluate the laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty and the treatment of the rectal urinary fistula by a bipolar sealing device. Method: It was performed according to the original description by Georgeson1. Was used 10 mm infraumbilical access portal for 30º optics. The pneumoperitoneum was established with pressure 8-10 cm H2O. Two additional trocars of 5 mm were placed on the right and left of the umbilicus. The dissection started on peritoneal reflection using Ligasure(r). With the reduction in the diameter of the distal rectum was identified the fistula to the urinary tract. The location of the new anus was defined by the location of the external anal sphincter muscle complex, using electro muscle stimulator externally. Finally, it was made an anastomosis between the rectum and the new location of the anus. A Foley urethral probe was left for seven days. Results: Seven males were operated, six with rectoprostatic and one with rectovesical fistula. The follow-up period ranged from one to four years. The last two patients operated underwent bipolar sealing of the fistula between the rectum and urethra without sutures or surgical ligation. No evidence of urethral leaks was identified. Conclusion: There are benefits of the laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty for the treatment of anorectal anomaly. The use of a bipolar energy source that seals the rectal urinary fistula has provided a significant decrease in the operating time and made the procedure be more elegant.

Our institution introduced a laparoscopic approach based on laparoscopy-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) to treat persistent cloaca (PC). This study aimed to describe our technique and evaluate its outcomes in comparison with those of previous approaches. We retrospectively analyzed 20 pediatric patients with PC who underwent anorectoplasty at our institution between January 2009 and September 2024. Rectal mobilization and anorectoplasty have previously been performed using the conventional transabdominal and/or posterior sagittal approaches. Laparoscopic rectal mobilization and fistula division using LAARP was introduced in 2016. Patients treated using these methods were divided into conventional and laparoscopic groups and analyzed. No significant differences in the clinical data were observed between the two groups, except for body weight. Similarly, no significant differences were observed in the surgical data. The postoperative follow-up duration was insufficient to adequately evaluate fecal incontinence. No intraoperative complications were observed in the laparoscopic group. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to compare laparoscopic and conventional approaches for treating PC at a single institution. Despite these limitations, our findings suggest that the laparoscopic approach may be safer than the conventional approach for PC repair with a lower risk of intraoperative vaginal injury.

A newly designed small-diameter rigid-rod neuroendoscope was created to evaluate the applicability of free-hand maneuvering during high-resolution imaging. The neuroendoscope was designed as a light, handheld tool weighing 550 g. A 20-cm-long objective lens, 2 mm in diameter, is placed in the lower two thirds of the single-space lumen of an oval-shaped outer sheath, 16.5 mm long and 3.5 x 2.5 mm at maximum diameter. Included are microinstruments of 1.3-mm diameter for various neuroendoscopic procedures, including microscissors, biopsy forceps, grasping forceps, monopolar coagulator/cutting rod, and bipolar coagulator that can be introduced through the upper one third of the lumen. Because the endoscope is held steady in the surgeon's left hand, with the handle gripped at the base, quick back-and-forth movements can be made along the long axis, via a peel-away sheath inserted to the ventricle, shifting of the endoscope tip to the side of the objective target will be minimal. Given the instrument's unified configuration, the surgeon will never lose orientation during maneuvering. Using the farthest right of three inlet/outlet orifices, the short and handy semiflexible microinstruments can be guided and controlled by the surgeon's right hand. After experience in 66 cases in which various neuroendoscopic procedures yielded excellent operative outcomes (morbidity rate in complications related to the endoscopic procedure 0%; mortality rate 0%), the endoscope prototype was finalized in the ideal form for frameless maneuvering that uses a rigid-rod endoscope. The "gun-butt" holder for use with the operator's left hand provides stability and allows the endoscope to be handled with improved control. These new aspects of the neuroendoscope and surgical technique offer substantial improvement over the flexible-steerable fiberoptic endoscopes.