Abstract

ABSTRACTThe Welfare (State) Regime Paradigm is rife with paradoxes. In spite of the general awareness of the much wider remit of Social Policy (as a field of study and public policy), the paradigm has narrowed the focus of the field to a set of social protection instruments. This is most evident in the ‘decommodification’ index used in Esping-Andersen's original typology. Equally problematic is the idea of ‘decommodification’. The diminution of social policy finds its most ardent expression in the late 20th century neoliberal take on social policy, although for normative reasons that many Social Policy scholars would find objectionable. Reclaiming the wider vision of social policy requires re-reading history and the pioneers. It is against this background that we set out the idea of transformative social policy and the wider vision of Social Policy at the epistemic and policy levels. Central to this are the multiple tasks of social policy, the diversity of instruments for addressing the ‘social question’, and the inherent inter-connection between economic and social policies.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.