Retrospective analysis of the treatment of atrial fibrillation in a cardiological setting at cardiology institute of Abidjan (Côte d'Ivoire)

POSTER PRESENTATIONS

ORAL PRESENTATION

0136 : CHA2DS2VASc score estimates in-hospital mortality beyond GRACE score after acute myocardial infarction

Use of the CHA2DS2-VASc score to predict subsequent myocardial infarction in atrial fibrillation

IntroductionThe CHA2DS2-VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes mellitus, stroke, vascular disease and sex) score is a simple risk stratification algorithm to estimate stroke/thromboembolic risk in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Higher pre-stroke CHA2DS2-VASc score is known to be associated with greater stroke severity and poorer outcomes. AF patients generally have higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores than non-AF patients. The Modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score is the most widely used grading system to assess the result of recanalizing therapies in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). mTICI 2c and mTICI 3 are conventionally accepted as successful recanalization.AimWe investigated whether pre-stroke CHA2DS2-VASc score is associated with mTICI recanalization score in AIS patients with and without AF undergoing percutaneous thrombectomy.Material and methodsOne hundred fifty-nine patients with the diagnosis of AIS who were admitted within 6 h from symptom onset were included in the study (mean age: 65.7 ±12.9). All subjects underwent endovascular treatment. CHA2DS2-VASc scores of the participants were calculated. Subjects were grouped according to mTICI scores achieved after endovascular treatment. mTICI 2c and mTICI 3 were accepted as successful recanalization.ResultsSuccessful reperfusion was observed in 130 (81.8%) of all patients who underwent endovascular treatment (mTICI flow ≥ 2c) and first-pass reperfusion was observed in 107 (67.3%) patients. When the patients with successful (mTICI flow ≥ 2c) and unsuccessful (mTICI flow ≤ 2b) reperfusion were divided into groups, no significant difference was observed between the patients in terms of comorbidities such as AF, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease and cerebrovascular accident history. Patients with unsuccessful reperfusion were older than patients with successful reperfusion (71.4 ±11.2 vs. 64.5 ±13.01, p = 0.006), with a higher CHA2DS2-VASc score (4.1 ±1.5 vs. 3.04 ±1.6, p = 0.002). In addition, the duration of the procedure was longer in the unsuccessful reperfusion group (92.4 ±27.2 min vs. 65.0 ±25.1 min, p < 0.001). CHA2DS2-VASc score significantly correlated with successful recanalization (correlation coefficient; 0.243, p = 0.002). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that only CHA2DS2-VASc score (OR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.09–1.87, p = 0.006) and procedure time (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01–1.05, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of successful reperfusion. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the cut-off value for the CHA2DS2-VASc score that best predicts successful reperfusion. The optimal threshold was 3.5, with a sensitivity of 58.6% and specificity of 59.2% (area under the curve (AUC): 0.669, p = 0.005).ConclusionsFor the first time in the literature, we investigated and demonstrated that pre-stroke CHA2DS2-VASc score was associated with success of recanalization as assessed with mTICI 2c and mTICI 3 in a cohort of AIS patients regardless of AF presence who underwent endovascular treatment. Our findings deserve to be tested with large scale long term studies.

Stroke represents the most devastating complication of atrial fibrillation (AF). Our understanding of the pathophysiology of thromboembolism in patients with AF remains incomplete, and as such, our assessment and management of this risk is imperfect. Current guidelines regard the risk of thromboembolism as independent of the frequency or duration of AF.1 Paradoxically, standard practice in the pericardioversion period considers thromboembolic risk to accrue after 48 hours of AF.1 This recommendation, however, is based on limited data, including an observational study of 357 patients which demonstrated that the risk of thromboembolic events was <1% in patients with AF lasting <48 hours who cardioverted without prolonged anticoagulation therapy or a transesophageal echocardiogram.2 No strong randomized control trial data exist to specifically support a 48-hour safety cut-off, and recent data suggest that the duration of AF associated with a significantly increased risk of stroke may in fact be less.3–8 The emergence of technology to allow absolute quantification of the frequency and duration, or burden, of AF offers the opportunity to refine our assessment and management of thromboembolic risk associated with AF. It has been 200 years since William Wood described a ball thrombus in the left atrium of a patient with mitral stenosis9 and 170 years since Virchow identified the critical components required for thrombus formation.10 It took until 1930 for Harvey and Levine to first declare that “auricular fibrillation definitely increases the incidence of auricular thrombosis” in an autopsy series of patients with mural thrombi.11 Uncertainty as to whether nonrheumatic AF resulted in stroke continued for the next 40 plus years until Wolfe and colleagues, in their landmark analysis using the Framingham population data, identified a 5.6-fold increased risk of stroke in patients with chronic nonvalvular AF.12 With time it would become …

Utilization of Anticoagulation and Antiplatelet Therapies in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

ObjectivesThe CHA2DS2-VASc score is the preferred risk model for anticoagulation decision-making in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Recent studies have found this score to have prognostic value in other cardiovascular diseases....

Joint European Atrial Fibrillation Guidelines Break New Ground

Introduction Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have an increased risk of thromboembolic events (TE), while patients with complicated liver cirrhosis have an increased risk of both TE and bleeding. Oral anticoagulation reduces the risk of TE in the general group of patients with AF but its use in patients with liver cirrhosis is obscured by their imbalance between endogenous procoagulants and anticoagulants, as well as the lack of data from randomized controlled trials. Purpose To examine the risks of TE and bleeding in patients with AF and complicated liver cirrhosis according to whether oral anticoagulation is initiated. Methods We conducted a nationwide registry-based study of anticoagulant-naive patients with complicated liver cirrhosis and first-time AF diagnosed between 2010–2017. Complicated liver cirrhosis was defined as liver cirrhosis plus one of the following: alcoholism, esophageal varices, ascites or hepatorenal syndrome. Patients were followed for a maximum of 5 years. TE was defined as a composite of ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack or systemic thromboembolism; and the bleeding endpoint was defined as gastrointestinal, cerebral or urogenital bleeding requiring hospitalization, or any hospital contact with epistaxis. TE risk was estimated by use of the CHA2DS2-VASc score, while bleeding risk was estimated by use of the HAS-BLED score. Outcomes were stratified according to whether an oral anticoagulant (vitamin K antagonists [VKA] or direct oral anticoagulants [DOAC]) was initiated. Results We identified 770 patients with complicated liver cirrhosis and first-time AF. TE events occurred in 7.0% (n=25/359) of patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≤2 versus 20.7% (n=85/411) of patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score &amp;gt;2. Among 411 patients with a high CHA2DS2-VASc score, 111 (27.0%) were prescribed an oral anticoagulant (OAC+; VKA, n=53 [47.7%], DOAC, n=58 [52.3%]), while 300 (73.0%) were not treated with oral anticoagulation (OAC−). These two groups had comparable baseline data, including HAS-BLED (OAC+ 3.0 [2.5–4.0] versus OAC− 3.0 [2.0–4.0]) and CHA2DS2-VASc (OAC+ 4.0 [3.0–5.0] versus OAC− 4.0 [3.0–5.0]) scores. The 5-year TE risk among patients receiving anticoagulant therapy was 14.4% (n=16/111) versus 23.0% (n=69/300) in patients not treated with anticoagulant therapy (hazard ratio (HR) 0.55 [0.32–0.95]). The difference in bleeding risk was insignificant between the two groups (HR 0.67 [0.35–1.30]). Adjusting for CHA2DS2-VASc, HAS-BLED and prior bleeding requiring hospitalization did not significantly change the HR estimate, and no significant interactions were found. Conclusion TE risk was significantly lower in AF patients with complicated liver cirrhosis treated with oral anticoagulation, without a significantly increased bleeding risk. However, the majority of AF patients with complicated liver cirrhosis are not treated with anticoagulant therapy, indicating a potential for reducing the TE burden in this population. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

After long years of using warfarin for atrial fibrillation, new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) became available for decreasing the risk of ischemic stroke. Our aim was to observe the physicians prescribing patterns of NOACs. This prospective observational study included patients using NOACs applying consecutively to our outpatient clinic. Physical examination was performed, and patient history, electrocardiogram, transthoracic echocardiography, and biochemical results were collected. Bleeding and ischemic stroke risk scores (HAS-BLED and CHA2DS2-VASc scores) were calculated. We evaluated patients' characteristics, risk factors, concomitant drug usage, and physicians' choices. The study consisted of 174 patients using NOACs (dabigatran 113 patients, rivaroxaban 61 patients), with a mean age of 70.7 ± 8.8 years. The mean HAS-BLED score was 1.74 ± 0.9 and the mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.7 ± 1.2. Fifty-three (30.4%) patients were prescribed low-dose NOAC according to the optimal dose, and 12 (6.8%) patients were prescribed high-dose NOAC according to the optimal dose. We compared optimal dose and undertreatment groups to find out if there was any predicting factor for physicians to use low dose of NOACs, but there was no significant difference between the two groups for age, sex, concomitant chronic disease, and CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores. NOACs were prescribed to patients mostly with high CHA2DS2-VASc score and low HAS-BLED score. Low-dose NOAC usage according to the optimal dose was frequent. Frequent coagulation monitoring and drug incompliance are big deficiencies at atrial fibrillation in use of warfarin. NOACs overcome these difficulties; however, physicians' hesitation to use NOACs with the optimal dosage may be another limitation in real-world practice.

Background The CHADS2 score is a well-known risk score for ischemic stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Recently, it has been reported that the CHADS2 score was associated with an increased risk of new-onset lower extremity artery disease (LEAD) in patients without AF, the association between the CHADS2 score and clinical outcomes in patients with LEAD undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT) without AF remains unclear. Furthermore, malnutrition assessed by the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) has been reported to be predictive of clinical outcomes in patients with LEAD. However, there are limited studies regarding the association of combined assessment of the GNRI and CHADS2 score and clinical outcomes in patients with LEAD without AF. Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between the combined assessment of GNRI and CHADS2 score, and mortality of LEAD patients undergoing EVT without AF. Methods This retrospective study investigated 236 consecutive LEAD patients who underwent EVT without AF. CHADS2 scores were calculated by assigning one point for heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, and diabetes; and assigning 2 points for a prior history of stroke or transient ischemic attack. The GNRI on admission was calculated as follows: [14.89 × albumin (g/dL)] + [41.7 × (body weight/ideal body weight)], and the CHADS2 score and GNRI were calculated for each patient. We scored GNRI by assigning 2 points to low GNRI (GNRI &amp;lt;82) and 1 point to intermediate GNRI (GNRI =82 to &amp;lt;92). We then calculated the CHADS2 plus GNRI score for each patient and then patients were divided into the high CHADS2 plus GNRI scoregroup (CHADS2 plus GNRI score&amp;gt; 2, n = 123) and the low CHADS2plus GNRI score group (CHADS2 plus GNRI score≤ 2, n = 113) according to the median CHADS2 plus GNRI score. We investigated the associations between all-cause mortality in patients with LEAD who underwent EVT and the CHADS2 plus GNRI score. Results The mean age was 71.9±10.4 years, and 66.9% were men. During the median follow-up of 752 (283–1472) days, 50 patients died. Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that the cumulative incidence of all-cause death was significantly higher in the high CHADS2 plus GNRI score group than in the low CHADS2 plus GNRI score group (log-rank p = 0.003). Furthermore, even in the multivariate analysis,after adjusting for other risk factors including hemodialysis and clinical frailty scale, CHADS2 plus GNRI score was independently associated with all-cause death (per one score increase, hazard ratio: 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.56, P=0.038). Conclusions In LEAD patients who underwent EVT without AF, a higher CHADS2 plus GNRI score was associated with an increased risk of all-cause death. A Combined CHADS2 plus GNRI score assessment may be a useful prognostic marker in patients with LEAD without AF.

Background Treatment with non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOAC) is the first option for primary prevention of ischaemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there is still an evidence gap regarding efficacy and safety of NOAC in patients with AF and severe valvular heart disease undergoing valvular intervention. Purpose The aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NOAC or no oral anticoagulant (OAC) treatment versus warfarin during the first 3 months after valvular intervention. Methods We used data from the National Quality Register SWEDEHEART and included all patients with AF discharged after surgical valvular intervention with bioprosthesis or valvuloplasty, or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) between 2010 and 2016. Outcomes, including the composite of cardiovascular (CV) events (CV death, ischaemic stroke or systemic embolism), major bleeding, and relevant comorbidities and OAC treatment at discharge were collected from the National Patient Register, the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register, and the National Cause of Death Register. The association between exposure (warfarin, NOAC or no OAC) and occurrence of composite CV events and major bleeding was explored using a time-dependent adjusted Cox regression analysis. Results In total, 4730 patients with AF and valvular intervention were included. The cohort had a mean age of 75 years, 35.9% were women and mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.3 (Table 1). The proportion of patients treated with warfarin was higher in patients undergoing surgical valve intervention whereas NOAC was more commonly prescribed to patients treated with TAVI. Rates of composite CV events and major bleeding was similar between patients treated with NOAC versus warfarin. No OAC treatment versus warfarin was associated with higher rate of composite CV event, but with no difference with regard to major bleeding (Table 1). Conclusion A large proportion of patients with AF undergoing valvular intervention was not treated with OAC despite having a high CHA2DS2-VASc score. Also, patients on no OAC versus warfarin had a higher risk of i CV events in the early phase after valvular intervention. The efficacy and safety of NOAC was similar compared to warfarin during the first 3 months after intervention. Treatment with OAC in patients with AF, irrespective of NOAC or warfarin, was associated with improved clinical outcome early after valve intervention. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent sustained arrhythmia. The prevalence is increasing with that of other cardiovascular risk factors in our low-income setting. It is potentially serious due to the associated complications. Few data exist on the epidemiology of AF in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Methodology: We carried out a cross-sectional study between 2005 and 2009 in the Cardiology Unit of the Douala General Hospital. Patients were adults ≥ 18 years of both sex, who had an ECG diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation and a comprehensive investigation of the cause of AF. Results: A total of 2581 patients were seen in this unit, of whom 182 (7.1%, [95%: 6.1-8.1]) had AF. Their mean age was 59.2 ± 15.4 years, and there were 100 (58.2%, [95% CI: 51-65.6], p = 0.002) females. Hypertension was the most frequent risk factor (77.3%, [95% CI: 70.3-82.8]), and 163 (95.3%, [95% CI: 90.7-97.8]) of the patients were symptomatic. Hypertensive heart disease (45.6%, [95% CI: 38.3-53.1]), idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (19.3%, [95% CI: 14.1-25.9]), and valvular heart disease (16.4%, [95% CI: 11.6-22.6]) were the main etiologic factors of AF. The most frequent complications were heart failure seen in 77 (45%, [37.8-52.5]) and ischemic stroke in 27 (15.5%, [95% CI: 11.1 - 22]) of patients. Digoxine was prescribed in 121 (70.8%, [95% CI: 63.6-77.1]) patients to control heart rate, while amiodarone was prescribed in 67 (29.2%, [95% CI: 32.2-46.7]) patients to revert to sinus rhythm. No electrical cardioversion was carried out. Aspirine was prescribed in 119 (69.6%, [95% CI: 62.3-76]) patients, and anti-vitamin K in 53 (30.4%, [95% CI: 24.5-38.3]) patients. Conclusion: Atrial fibrillation was seen in seven percent of patients in the Cardiology Unit of this low-income setting. Patients were relatively young compared with high income settings. Hypertension, idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, and valvular heart disease were the main causes. Rate control was the main treatment strategy. Oral anti-coagulants were less frequently used.

<i>Stroke</i> : Highlights of Selected Articles