Abstract

The city is arguably where innovations concentrate. Agglomeration and diversity are two major explanations for why innovations concentrate in the city. Existing studies tend to focus on knowledge dynamics, in particular interfirm networks, while paying insufficient attention to the process of urban development in which knowledge dynamics are materialized. We concur that the city itself does not possess such a power for innovation (Shearmur, 2012). Rather, it is an arena where various actors exert impacts on knowledge dynamics. In a view from China, we reveal why bio-tech innovations concentrate in particular places and what political economic processes contribute to such concentration. We highlight the need for a political economic analysis in economic geographical studies of innovation.

Highlights

  • The concentration of economic innovation in the city has almost ‘become a research premise’ as opposed to a research question (Shearmur, 2012)

  • Given that there is a fruitful literature of relational economic geography (Bathelt, Malmberg, & Maskell, 2004; Martin & Sunley, 2006; Rutten, 2017; Yeung, 2005), it is the right time to rethink the connection between innovation and cities (Shearmur, 2012)

  • We tentatively provide a view from China, in particular biotech innovation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The concentration of economic innovation in the city has almost ‘become a research premise’ as opposed to a research question (Shearmur, 2012). Given that there is a fruitful literature of relational economic geography (Bathelt, Malmberg, & Maskell, 2004; Martin & Sunley, 2006; Rutten, 2017; Yeung, 2005), it is the right time to rethink the connection between innovation and cities (Shearmur, 2012). We try to explain why biotech innovation in China is heavily concentrated in major cities and their high-tech parks. As an emerging market in the global South, China has recently experienced economic restructuring and is striving to develop innovation capacities (Fu, Pietrobelli, & Soete, 2011; Grimes & Du, 2013; Zhang & Wu, 2012). We conclude with the importance of political economic analysis within economic geographic studies of innovation

Agglomeration and diversity and their limitations
The city as an arena of innovation
The central state: building an innovation nation
The entrepreneurial local government: building innovation spaces
The city as an arena for innovation actors
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.