Abstract
Abstract The English March (EM) defined the sound of the nation for four centuries, but its rhythm and sound have been almost entirely lost, despite the availability of music from the 17th and 18th centuries. Attempts over the past half-century to interpret the music have produced unsatisfactory translations, because they have had to augment the music provided and have not convincingly defined the rudiments depicted in the original sources. I argue that applying rules derived from white mensural notation and Arbeau’s Orchésographie to the EM’s rhythm produces a strong 34 interpretation. Additionally, a study of three surviving versions of the EM and a survey of 18th- and 19th-century drum rudiments allows us to form a complete picture of the rudimental complexity of the EM. The resulting beating represents the closest interpretation to the original EM that current resources allow, and therefore constitutes a major advance in the interpretation of early British military music.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.