Abstract
We appreciate the interest of Dr Magalhaes and colleagues in our recent article.1 Our responses to their points are as follows. (1) We agree that factoring in the acuity of the clinical presentation during revascularization is pertinent because it may influence revascularization decisions. We performed additional analyses pertaining to this issue, which we will present at the upcoming 2013 American Heart Association Scientific Sessions in Dallas, Texas; we hope to see Drs Magalhaes, Waksman, and Barbash there to review our (currently embargoed) findings. (2) To address concerns about right censoring, we provide the survival probability (upper and lower confidence intervals with the standard error [SE]) for each cohort …
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
