Abstract

The steam reforming of ethanol (SRE) on a bimetallic RhPt/CeO2 catalyst was evaluated by the integration of Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Aspen Plus (version 9.0, Aspen Tech, Burlington, MA, USA, 2016). First, the effect of the Rh–Pt weight ratio (1:0, 3:1, 1:1, 1:3, and 0:1) on the performance of SRE on RhPt/CeO2 was assessed between 400 to 700 °C with a stoichiometric steam/ethanol molar ratio of 3. RSM enabled modeling of the system and identification of a maximum of 4.2 mol H2/mol EtOH (700 °C) with the Rh0.4Pt0.4/CeO2 catalyst. The mathematical models were integrated into Aspen Plus through Excel in order to simulate a process involving SRE, H2 purification, and electricity production in a fuel cell (FC). An energy sensitivity analysis of the process was performed in Aspen Plus, and the information obtained was used to generate new response surfaces. The response surfaces demonstrated that an increase in H2 production requires more energy consumption in the steam reforming of ethanol. However, increasing H2 production rebounds in more energy production in the fuel cell, which increases the overall efficiency of the system. The minimum H2 yield needed to make the system energetically sustainable was identified as 1.2 mol H2/mol EtOH. According to the results of the integration of RSM models into Aspen Plus, the system using Rh0.4Pt0.4/CeO2 can produce a maximum net energy of 742 kJ/mol H2, of which 40% could be converted into electricity in the FC (297 kJ/mol H2 produced). The remaining energy can be recovered as heat.

Highlights

  • At the Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP21) of the United Nations (UN) held in Paris in 2015, the urgency of global replacement of fossil fuels by renewable energy sources was raised [1]

  • The experimental data shown as Appendix (Table A1) was used to obtain response surfaces of these catalytic materials from 400 to 700 ◦ C

  • The results reported in this paper confirm that it is energetically feasible to carry out H2 production and purification in separated steps in order to ensure good quality of the H2 streams that are fed into the fuel cell (FC), but avoiding a low temperature water gas shift reaction (WGSR) reactor

Read more

Summary

Introduction

At the Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP21) of the United Nations (UN) held in Paris in 2015, the urgency of global replacement of fossil fuels by renewable energy sources was raised [1]. This has promoted the development of engineering projects related to sustainable fuels. Most H2 is produced from non-renewable resources such as natural gas, but biomass has been proposed as a sustainable source for H2 production. Bioethanol is blended with gasoline (8–10 vol %) in transport applications. The use of ethanol/gasoline mixtures in Catalysts 2017, 7, 15; doi:10.3390/catal7010015 www.mdpi.com/journal/catalysts

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.