Abstract
We prove an exponential lower bound for the length of any resolution proof for the same set of clauses as the one used by Urquhart [13]. Our contribution is a significant simplification in the proof and strengthening of the bound, as compared to [13]. We use on the one hand a simplification similar to the one suggested by Beame and Pitassi in [1] for the case of the pidgeon hole clauses. Additionally, we base our construction on a simpler version of expander graphs than the ones used in [13]. These expander graphs are located in the core of the construction. We show the existence of our expanders by a Kolmogorov complexity argument which has not been used before in this context and might be of independent interest since the applicability of this method is quite general.KeywordsConjunctive Normal FormKolmogorov ComplexityExpansion PropertyExpander GraphResolution StepThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
