Abstract
In England, apprenticeship and vocational education and training (VET) policies more generally have been driven at different times by three overlapping logics: “employment logic”; “education logic”; and “social logic”. As a consequence of the tense relationship between these logics, considerable variability in the way apprenticeship and VET programmes are organized and experienced remains a key feature of the English approach. Drawing on policy-history and social theories of learning, this chapter explores the impact this has had on the way apprenticeship in particular has evolved and the interventions of successive governments. It asks how quality in apprenticeship might be interpreted and analysed in a policy climate that suggests competing logics are failing to achieve greater consistency across apprenticeship programmes. Philipp Gonon has highlighted the importance of quality as a rhetorical device for maintaining a focus on the aspects of VET provision, which ensure that it is genuinely “significant and successful”. In that spirit, the chapter proposes a conceptual framework for evaluating apprenticeship quality to generate an approach that better meets the needs of apprentices, employers and society.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.