Abstract

Under the carbon cap-and-trade mechanism, we consider an emission-dependent supply chain consisting of a supplier, a manufacturer, and a 3PL firm that adopts variable transportation fee strategy. Five models on the basis of the supplier and manufacturer with or without capital constraints are considered to discuss members’ optimal decisions. The insights are obtained as follows. First, the ordering quantity under 3PL financing service is larger than that under two firms are well-funded when the transportation fee or carbon emission is less than a certain constant. The variable transportation fee strategy and members’ carbon emission reduction behavior are beneficial to each supply chain participant. Second, the carbon emissions of members decide whose capital constraint is more beneficial to 3PL firm, and 3PL prefers to cooperate with a medium rich manufacturer (rich supplier). Third, the external financing modes are analyzed to get the 3PL financing service can create new value for the manufacturer and 3PL if the transportation fee is below a threshold, and this threshold increases with the manufacturer’s carbon emission. When the transportation fee is larger than a threshold, a capital-constrained supplier will choose bank financing, and this threshold decreases with the supplier’s carbon emission. Finally, we demonstrate that the manufacturer’s loss aversion (carbon cap) can increase (decrease) its bankruptcy threshold.

Highlights

  • In recent years, the carbon emissions contribute a lot to global warming, and many countries seek various carbon regulations to reduce the operation-related carbon emissions

  • We explore the impacts of cap-and-trade system, variable transportation fee strategy and manufacturer’s loss aversion on financing operations and profits of the supply chain

  • We investigate the impacts of cap-and-trade system and variable transportation fee strategy on the optimal decision-making and profits of supply chain members

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The carbon emissions contribute a lot to global warming, and many countries seek various carbon regulations to reduce the operation-related carbon emissions. We try to introduce the 3PL’s transportation and financing service into an emission-dependent supply chain with cap-and-trade system. How does the capital-constrained supplier and manufacturer make optimal operational decisions when 3PL provides financing service? What are the impacts of cap-and-trade system, 3PL’s variable transportation fee, and members’ initial capital on the operations and financing decisions of firms? We explore the impacts of cap-and-trade system, variable transportation fee strategy and manufacturer’s loss aversion on financing operations and profits of the supply chain.

Cap-And-Trade System
Integrated Management of Operation and Finance
Modeling Framework of Supply Chain Financing
Notation and Assumption
The Optimal Strategies under Supplier Financing Service Mode
The Equilibrium under Two Firms Are with Capital Constraints
The Optimal Strategies of 3PL Firm
The Optimal Strategies under Manufacturer with Capital Constraint
The Optimal Strategies under Supplier with Capital Constraint
The Impact of Manufacturer’s Loss Aversion
The Optimal Strategies under 3PL Firm Financing Service Mode
Results and Analysis
Numerical Analysis
Impact of Relevant Parameters on Optimal Operational Strategies
Impact of Relevant Parameters on Optimal Profits
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.