Abstract

Additive manufacturing has been applied in many fields, but its layer-by-layer fabrication process leads to a weak inter-layer bond strength of printed parts, so it cannot meet the higher requirements for mechanical properties of the industry. At present, many researchers are studying the printing path planning method to improve the mechanical properties of printed parts. This paper proposes a method to plan the printing path according to the actual stress of pipe parts, and introduces the realization process of an algorithm in detail, and obtains the printing control G-code. Additionally, a 5-axis material extrusion platform was built to realize the printing of polylactic acid pipes with plane and space skeleton curves, respectively, which verified the feasibility and applicability of the method and the correctness of the planning path with standard material extrusion filaments. Finally, the tensile and bending experiments prove that axial printing enhances the mechanical properties of pipe parts.

Highlights

  • Additive manufacturing (AM), known as 3D printing (3DP), has many advantages, such as complex structure construction, short shaping cycle and high material utilization rate, so it has attracted the attention of many scholars worldwide

  • The inner surface of the part to be printed is extracted, and the pipe support is printed using the traditional 3D printing method according to the conventional slicing

  • Since there is no standard for the direct testing of pipe parts, the test samples were conducted by using the plastic tensile property testing standard GB/T 1040.2-2006/ISO 527-2:1993, were generated by simulating the axial printing path of pipe parts, and the mechanical testing and the plastic bending property testing standard GB/T 9341-2008/ISO 178:2001

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Additive manufacturing (AM), known as 3D printing (3DP), has many advantages, such as complex structure construction, short shaping cycle and high material utilization rate, so it has attracted the attention of many scholars worldwide. It has achieved many results in materials, process, and equipment. It has been widely used in many fields [1,2,3]. AM technology still has some technical limitations, mainly including layer-by-layer stacking printing process resulting in a step effect and low surface accuracy, and insufficient adhesion between layers results in low strength in the Z-axis direction. Taking the most common material extrusion (MEX) process, it is necessary to produce supporting structures when printing cantilever or hollow parts, so that the printing time and material costs are inevitably increased. For solving the above problems, researchers in various countries have carried out a lot of research work on printing path planning methods

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.