Abstract
This article sets two of Hoffmann’s satiric fairy-tales, “Little Zaches acclaimed as Zinnober” (1819) and “Master Flea” (1822), in their socio-political context of post-Napoleonic Europe. It identifies them as political allegories through which Hoffmann comments on the instability of western European politics in the early nineteenth century. We demonstrate how Hoffmann’s position as a Prussian state judge informed his propensity for satirical observation couched in the genre of fairy-tale and variations thereof. We explore his scrutiny of hypocrisy, pride and nepotism, together with his particular focus on received ideas, such as Enlightenment rationalist principles. Concomitantly, we examine how he reworks familiar fairy-tale motifs in order to expose the effects of political repression. We compare the lampoon of his contemporary, Friedrich Ludwig Jahn (founder of the Open Air Gymnasium Movement) in “Little Zaches”, with his satirization of Privy Councillor von Kamptz (Director of Prussian Military Police) as Councillor Knarrpanti in “Master Flea”, the first fairy-tale causing wry amusement, but the second leading to a high profile libel case. We align with Zipes’s argument that Hoffmann’s fairy-tales demonstrate connections between history, politics and the fairy-tale, and we show how Hoffmann’s revisioning of fairy-tale motifs mediates political satire. We extend Zipes by emphasizing Hoffmann’s use of the increasingly popular Oriental, and especially Arabian, tale. This article concludes that Hoffmann contributed significantly to the critical acclaim of the satiric fairy-tale, and that his loss of literary judgement in “Master Flea” accounts for the legal consequences which he suffered.
Highlights
1.1 Hoffmann in Prussia 1809In August 1809, while struggling to establish his musical career in Bamberg, southern Prussia (Germany), Hoffmann wrote to a music publishing company: “This odious [Napoleonic] war has once more destroyed all my prospects and hopes” (Sahlin, 1977: 157)
We compare the lampoon of his contemporary, Friedrich Ludwig Jahn in “Little Zaches”, with his satirization of Privy Councillor von Kamptz (Director of Prussian Military Police) as Councillor Knarrpanti in “Master Flea”, the first fairy-tale causing wry amusement, but the second leading to a high profile libel case
Narrator Murr naively describes his initiation into the tomcat student club, assuring his readers that these ceremonies bear no resemblance to those of secret societies, which were widespread at that time and always considered politically subversive by the Prussian government
Summary
In August 1809, while struggling to establish his musical career in Bamberg, southern Prussia (Germany), Hoffmann wrote to a music publishing company: “This odious [Napoleonic] war has once more destroyed all my prospects and hopes” (Sahlin, 1977: 157). He was referring to the precarious state of the theatres in Bamberg, Dresden and Leipzig, where he worked variously as a conductor, composer and theatre factotum. In May 1808 he remarked in a letter sent from Berlin to his boyhood friend, Hippel, that “Bread, currently priced beyond the means of the poor and often not to be had at all, was the cause of disorderly www.ccsenet.org/jpl
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
