Abstract
The editors of MR do not feel they can afford the space I would require to analyze the falsity of Malthusian doctrine and to discuss the many errors which Professor Fairchild made in his article. They have given me the space, however, to outline my views briefly and to answer the specific points on which Professor Fairchild based his diagnosis of my unscientific rejection of Malthus. I shall refrain from comment on Professor Fairchild's discussion of Marxism, since neither of us is an expert in that field.This article can also be found at the Monthly Review website, where most recent articles are published in full.Click here to purchase a PDF version of this article at the Monthly Review website.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
