Abstract
In order to clarify the difference of outcomes between our recent work [Y. Yuri et al., Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 10, 104001 (2007)] and the work done by Los Alamos National Laboratory in the 1990s outlined in the Comment [R. E. Shafer, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 11, 039001 (2008)], we briefly summarize the former progress of the research and development on beam uniformization by means of the nonlinear focusing method, and insist on the newness of our recent publication in this Reply.
Highlights
In order to clarify the difference of outcomes between our recent work [Y
A series of the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) work is summarized in Ref. [11]
The uniformity of 4% seemed to be less suitable for this purpose
Summary
In order to clarify the difference of outcomes between our recent work [Y. Yuri et al, Phys. The first experiment of uniform beam formation using octupole magnets was successfully carried out at Brookhaven National Laboratory [8]. The size of the uniform region was only several centimeters square and its uniformity was 7.5%.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
