Abstract

Phase G reported by Ohtani et al. [1997] and Kudoh et al. [1997a] is identical with the new phase D reported by Kuroda and Irifune [1998] and Yang et al. [1997]. However, there is ambiguity on existence of phase D defined by Liu [1987]. There are following possibilities on existence of Liu's phase D; (1) the product was a mixture of phase G and the other contaminant phases, (2) it realy exists stably in different pressure and temperature conditions from those studied by our works, or (3) the phase is a metastable phase formed due to a short run duration and/or no sealing of water in the diamond anvil cell. Therefore, it is not appropriate to use the name phase D for the dense hydrous magnesium silicate phase G reported by us [Ohtani et al., 1997].

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.