Abstract
In their comment, Feser et al. [2003] argue that the NCEP Reanalysis surface winds used by Alford [2003; henceforth A03] are artificially high at high frequencies due to temporal aliasing. This possibility is investigated here by direct comparison with buoy winds in the northeastern Atlantic. As in a previous more extensive buoy comparison in the Pacific [Alford, 2001; henceforth A01], no evidence for aliasing of NCEP winds is found.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
