Abstract

The Asian Monsoon Anticyclone (AMA) represents the wettest region in the lower stratosphere (LS) and is the key contributor to the global annual maximum in LS water vapour. While the AMA wet pool is linked with persistent convection in the region and horizontal confinement of the anticyclone, there remain ambiguities regarding the role of tropopause-overshooting convection in maintaining the regional LS water vapour maximum. This study tackles this issue using a unique set of observations from onboard the high-altitude M55-Geophysica aircraft deployed in Nepal in Summer 2017 within the EU StratoClim project. We use a combination of airborne measurements (water vapour, ice water, water isotopes, cloud backscatter) together with ensemble trajectory modeling coupled with satellite observations to characterize the processes controlling water vapour and clouds in the confined lower stratosphere (CLS) of AMA. Our analysis puts in evidence the dual role of overshooting convection, which may lead to hydration or dehydration depending on the synoptic-scale tropopause temperatures in AMA. We show that all of the observed CLS water vapour enhancements are traceable to convective events within AMA and furthermore bear an isotopic signature of the overshooting process. A surprising result is that the plumes of moist air with mixing ratios nearly twice the background level can persist for weeks whilst recirculating within the anticyclone, without being subject to irreversible dehydration through ice settling. Our findings highlight the importance of convection and recirculation within AMA for the transport of water into the stratosphere.

Highlights

  • Water vapour in the lower stratosphere has a direct impact on surface climate and stratospheric ozone chemistry (e.g. Dessler et al, 2013, Dvortsov and Solomon, 2001)

  • The occurrence of water vapour enhancements in the lower stratosphere associated with overshooting convection has been reported in several studies based on in situ measurements in the deep tropics over Western Africa (Khaykin et al, 2009; Schiller 445 et al, 2009), Northern Australia (Kley et al, 1993; Corti et al, 2008), South America (Khaykin et al, 2013), Central America (Sargent et al, 2014), Western Pacific (Jensen et al, 2020) as well as at midlatitudes over North American monsoon (Hanisco et al, 2007; Weinstock et al, 2007; Smith et al, 2017) and Asian monsoon (Vernier et al, 2018; Brunamonti et al, 2018; Krämer et al, 2020)

  • We note that the reported cases represent a small fraction of in situ measurements acquired; there is typically no more than one case of water vapour enhancement above the tropopause detected during a field campaign

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Water vapour in the lower stratosphere has a direct impact on surface climate and stratospheric ozone chemistry (e.g. Dessler et al, 2013, Dvortsov and Solomon, 2001). The variability of global lower stratospheric water vapour is, to first order, regulated by the minimum temperature in the Tropical Tropopause Layer (TTL) – the main gateway for stratospheric entry of tropospheric moisture (e.g., Fueglistaler et al, 2009, and references therein). The AMA is characterized by a persistent maximum of water vapour extending up to 68 hPa level (Park et al, 2007; Santee et al, 2017), which makes it the wettest region in the Boreal summer lower stratosphere. This large-scale maximum is conditioned by convective uplift of moist air in the Asian monsoon region and its horizontal confinement within the anticyclone (Dethof et al, 1999; Ploeger et al, 2015).

StratoClim campaign and airborne instruments
In situ water measurements
In situ temperature and cloud measurements
Satellite observations
Definitions
Ensemble trajectory modeling and convective cloud top data
Satellite perspective
Airborne perspective
Convective influence on CLS water vapour
Isotopic composition of convective plumes
Geographical distribution of convective sources
Long-range transport and evolution of moist convective plumes
Warm and wet regime
Secondary cloud formation
Cold and dry regime
Secondary cloud sublimation
Findings
Discussion and summary
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.