Abstract

In the context of the first phase of the Euro-CORDEX Flagship Plot Study (FPS) Land Use and Climate Across Scales (LUCAS), we investigate the afforestation impact on the seasonal cycle of soil temperature over the European continent with an ensemble of ten regional climate models (RCMs). For this purpose, each ensemble member performed two idealized land cover experiments in which Europe is covered either by forests or grasslands. The multi-model mean exhibits a reduction of the annual amplitude of soil temperature (AAST) over all European regions, although this not a robust feature among the models. In Mediterranean, the simulated AAST response to afforestation is between −4 K and +2 K while in Scandinavia the inter-model spread ranges from −7 K to +1 K. We then examine the role of changes in the annual amplitude of ground heat flux (AAGHF) and summer soil moisture content (SMC) in determining the effect of afforestation on AAST response. In contrast with the diverging results in AAST, all the models consistently indicate a widespread AAGHF decrease and summer SMC decline due to afforestation. The AAGHF changes effectively explain the largest part of the inter-model variance in AAST response in most regions, while the changes in summer SMC determine the sign of AAST response within a group of three simulations sharing the same land surface model. Finally, we pair FLUXNET sites to compare the simulated results with observation-based evidence of the impact of forest on soil temperature. In line with models, observations indicate a summer ground cooling in forested areas compared to open lands. The vast majority of models agree with the sign of the observed reduction in AAST, although with a large variation in the magnitude of changes. Overall, we aspire to emphasize the effects of afforestation on soil temperature profile with this study, given that changes in the seasonal cycle of soil temperature potentially perturb crucial biochemical processes. Such perturbations can be of societal relevance as afforestation is proposed as a climate change mitigation strategy.

Highlights

  • There is currently a strong policy focus on afforestation as a possible greenhouse gases (GHG) mitigation strategy to meet ambitious climate targets (Grassi et al, 2017)

  • 65 The crucial need to better constrain and represent the land-use changes (LUC) biophysical forcing in regional climate simulations over Europe, generated the Euro-CORDEX (Jacob et al, 2020) FPS Land Use and Climate Across Scales (LUCAS) initiative (Davin et al, 2020) which operates under the auspices of the World Climate Research Program (WCRP)

  • Taking into 85 account the second heat conduction law, we examine both the annual amplitude of ground heat flux (AAGHF) (Sect. 3.2) and summer soil moisture content (SMC) (Sect. 3.3) responses to afforestation, in order to explain the inter-model spread in annual amplitude of soil temperature (AAST) (Sect. 3.4)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is currently a strong policy focus on afforestation as a possible greenhouse gases (GHG) mitigation strategy to meet ambitious climate targets (Grassi et al, 2017). In the context of Land-Use and Climate, IDentification of Robust Impacts (LUCID) model intercomparison project, (Noblet-Ducoudré et al, 2012) diagnosed the LUC effects over North America and Eurasia between the present and the pre-industrial era They found that deforestation caused a systematic surface albedo increase across all seasons, leading to a reduction in available energy accompanied by a decrease in the sum of turbulent fluxes. (Lejeune et al, 2015) used a state-of-the-art RCM to explore the biophysical impacts of possible future deforestation on Amazonian climate They demonstrated that the projected 60 land cover changes for 2100 could slightly increase the mean annual surface temperature by 0.5 oC and decrease the mean annual rainfall by -0.17 mm/day compared to present conditions. We compare the simulated impact on AAST with observational evidence based on FLUXNET paired sites, classified as forest or open land (Sect. 3.5)

Regional Climate Model ensemble
Experimental design
FLUXNET observational data
Results
Annual amplitude of GHF 225
Soil moisture
FLUXNET paired sites
Conclusions
Code and data availability
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.