Abstract

Repeated games, such as the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma (IPD), are often used as idealised models of social interactions. Here, I develop a state space approach to the study of two-player, repeated games. A strategy is represented by way of a state space, where a player's choice of action depends on the current state, and where the actions performed can cause transitions from one state to another. This kind of representation provides a possible link between a game theoretical analysis and concepts from mechanistically oriented ethology, where an individual's state is viewed as made up of motivational variables. Using the concept of a limit ESS for a game in the extensive form, I derive a number of fundamental results for state space strategies. Conditions ensuring purity of a limit ESS are given, as well as a characterisation of the most important class of pure limit ESSs. The theoretical analysis covers games with and without a role asymmetry and also games where players move alternately. To illustrate the state space approach, I apply the theoretical results to three examples. First, the role symmetric IPD, I find a great number of pure limit ESSs, and relate these to the strategies most frequently studied previously. I also discuss whether there can be randomised limit ESSs, concluding that although this is possible, none have been found so far. Second, as a game possessing a role asymmetry, I study a simplified model of social dominance. I concentrate on the question of whether punishment administered by a dominant can determine the allocation of a resource between the dominant and a subdominant. The game turns out to have limit ESSs with this property, but there are also stable strategies where the dominant lacks control. Third, I analyse an alternating Prisoner's Dilemma, which is a natural model to investigate the evolution of reciprocal altruism. No stable strategy for this game has been described previously. Of the limit ESSs I find, one is of particular interest, in that is closely corresponds to the notion of reciprocal altruism as conceived by Trivers.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.