Removal of CO2 in a Multistage Fluidized Bed Reactor by Activated Carbon Prepared from Green Coconut Shell

ABSTRACTTo mitigate the emission of carbon dioxide (CO2), we have developed and designed a four-stage fluidized bed reactor. There is a counter current exchange between solid adsorbent and gas flow. In this present investigation diethanol amine (DEA) impregnated activated carbon made from green coconut shell was used as adsorbent. This type of adsorbent not only adsorbs CO2 due to the presence of pore but also chemically reacts with CO2 and form secondary zwitterions. Sampling and analysis of CO2 was performed using Orsat apparatus. The effect of initial CO2 concentration, gas velocity, solid rate, weir height etc. on removal efficiency of CO2 have been investigated and presented. The percentage removal of CO2 has been found close to 80% under low gas flow rate (0.188 m/s), high solid flow rate (4.12 kg/h) and weir height of 50 mm. From this result it has been found out that multistage fluidized bed reactor may be a suitable equipment for removal of CO2 from flue gas.

Comparison of adsorption capacity of mono-ethanolamine and di-ethanolamine impregnated activated carbon in a multi-staged fluidized bed reactor for carbon-dioxide capture

The increase of carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration in the atmosphere leads to global warming and climate change. To mitigate the emission of CO2, we have developed and designed a four stage fluidised bed reactor and it was operated in a continuous counter-current manner. The adsorbents used for this fluidised bed reactor were monoethanolamine impregnated activated carbon (MEA-AC) of different impregnation (0.2,0.4 and 0.6) and activated carbon (AC) prepared from green coconut shell. Changing the three hydrodynamics factors like gas velocity, solid flow rate and weir height, the maximum % removal of CO2 has been found out. Sampling and analysis has been performed by using Orsat apparatus. The percentage (%) removal of CO2 by AC was minimum due to only physical adsorption of CO2. MEA-AC, having highest impregnation ratio (0.6) shows maximum % removal of CO2 because MEA is of less viscous, Stable carbamate ion formed because of the –I effect of one alcohol groups during the reaction of CO2 with MEA-AC that leads to more adsorption. The higher impregnation ratio leads to more removal of CO2 because more amine functional groups are present in the AC surface. Both physical adsorption as well as chemical adsorption occurs in MEA-AC. The maximum % removal of CO2 for MEA-AC (0.6) was 94.9%, under the solid flow rate of 4.12 kg/h, superficial gas velocity of 0.188 m/s and the weir height of 50 mm.

Carbon dioxide (CO2) is the major component of greenhouse gas. Increase in concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere leads to global warming. To remove the CO2 from waste flue gas a four-stage counter-current multistage fluidized bed adsorber was developed and operated in continuous bubbling fluidization regime for the two-phase system. This paper describes the optimum condition for CO2 removal efficiency in a multistage fluidized bed reactor using amine impregnated activated carbon. Response surface methodology with central composite design was used to determine the effect of three variables on the response. The variables are inlet concentration of CO2 in ppm (ranging from 3000 to 20,000), impregnation ratio of monoethanol amine (ranging from 0.2 to 0.6) and weir height in mm (20–60). The response was CO2 removal efficiency. The factor which was most influential has been identified from the analysis of variance. The optimum CO2 removal efficiency for the amine impregnated activated carbon (MEA-AC) was found to be 95.17%, at initial concentration of CO2 7312.85 ppm, chemical impregnation ratio of 0.31, and weir height 48.65 mm. From the experiment, the CO2 removal efficiency was found to be 95.97% at the same operating conditions. The predicted response was found to relevance with experimental data.

Carbon dioxide and its different compounds are generated as primary greenhouse gases from the flue gases of coal-fired thermal power plants, boilers, and other stationary combustion processes. This greenhouse gas causes global warming after being emitted to the environment. To deal with this problem, a new dry scrubbing process was tested in this study. A three-stage countercurrent fluidized bed adsorber was developed, designed, and fabricated. It was used as a removal apparatus and operated in a continuous regime for the two-phase system. The height of each stage was 0.30 m, and the inner diameter was 0.10 m. The paper presents the removal of CO2 from gas mixtures by chemical sorption on porous granular calcium oxide particles in the reactor at ambient temperature. The advantages of a multistage fluidized bed reactor for high mass transfer and high gas−solid contact can enhance the removal of the gas when using a dry method. The effects of the operating parameters such as sorbent, superficial gas velocity, and the Weir height on CO2 removal efficiency in the multistage fluidized bed were investigated. The results indicate that the removal efficiency of the carbon dioxide was around 71% at a high solid flow rate corresponding to lower gas velocity at room temperature. In comparison with wet scrubbers, this dry process appears to have lower cost, less complicated configuration, and simpler disposal of used sorbent. The results in this study assume importance from the perspective of use of a multistage fluidized bed adsorber for control of gaseous pollutants at high temperature.

Limits to Paris compatibility of CO2 capture and utilization

The first in the series of Azuberths Game Changer publications “Synergy of the Conventional Crude Oil and the FT-GTL Processes for Sustainable Synfuels Production: The Game Changer Approach-Phase One Category” a.k.a. (DOI: 10.23880/ppej16000330) is targeted at reducing 80 per cent CO2 emissions from the internal combustion engines by upgrading from the conventional crude oil refinery products to the synthetic fuels products (ultra-low-carbon fuels). This paper will focus on the complete elimination of the remaining 20 per cent CO2 emissions (i.e. to achieve zero- CO2 emissions) in transportation and power generating internal combustion engines as well as in the other centralized emissions/emitters such as petroleum industry flare lines, industrial process and big technology industries scrubber flue gas, et cetera. This invention stems from similar biblical quote {Isaiah 6:8-New International Version (NIV)} which states, and then I heard the voice of the Lord saying, “Whom shall I send? And who will go for us?” And I (Isaiah) said, “Here am I. Send me!” Laterally, in this case I (Azunna) said, “Here am I. Please use me”. Hence the aftermath, IJN-Universal Emissions Liquefiers is a plug and play units for all categories of pollutants discharge into the atmosphere. The work is motivated by the scientific facts that (i) The release of CO2 from automotive exhaust effluents, industry vents and flue gas emissions into the atmosphere contributes to greenhouse gas (GHG) accumulation causing global warming hence climate changes issues such as flooding of coastlines/sea-rising, melting of the glaciers, disrupted weather patterns, bushburning/wildfire, depletion of Ozone layer, smog and air pollution, acidification of water bodies, runaway greenhouse effect, etc. (ii) Every gas stream (e.g., flue gas) can be made liquid by e.g. a series of compression, cooling and expansion steps and once in liquid form, the components of the gas can be separated in a distillation column. (iii) Captured liquefied gases can be put to various uses, especially carbon dioxide (CO2 ), which can be used for the production of renewable energy via Synfuels such as the e-fuel/solar fuel. The natural atmosphere is composed of 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen, 0.9% argon, and only about 0.1% natural greenhouse gases, which include carbon dioxide, organic chemicals called chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), methane, nitrous oxide, ozone, and many others. Although a small amount, these greenhouse gases make a big difference - they are the gases that allow the greenhouse effect to exist by trapping in some heat that would otherwise escape to space. Carbon dioxide, although not the most potent of the greenhouse gases, is the most important because of the huge volumes emitted into the air by combustion of fossil fuels (e.g., gasoline, diesel, fuel oil, coal, natural gas). In general, the major contributors to the greenhouse effect are: Burning of fossil fuels in automobiles, deforestation, farming processing and manufacturing factories, industrial waste and landfills, increasing animal and human respiration, etc. The increased number of factories, automobiles, and population increases the amount of these gases in the atmosphere. The greenhouse gases never let the radiations to escape from the earth atmosphere and increase the surface temperature of the earth. This then leads to global warming. The petroleum industry well sites vent/flare gases (methane, ethane, propane, butanes, H2 O (g), O2 , N2 , etc.). Internal combustion engines (automobiles-cars, vehicles, ships, trains, planes, etc.) release exhaust effluents (containing H2 O (g), CO2 , O2 , and N2 ); steam generators in large power plants and the process furnaces in large refineries, petrochemical and chemical plants, and incinerators burn considerable amounts of fossil fuels and therefore emit large amounts of flue gas to the ambient atmosphere. In general, Flue gas is the gas exiting to the atmosphere via a “flue”, which is a pipe or channel for conveying exhaust gases from a fireplace, oven, furnace, boiler or steam generator. The emitted flue gas contains carbon dioxide CO2 , carbon monoxide CO, sulphur oxide SO2 , nitrous oxide NO and particulates. Furthermore, GTL plants produce CO2 , H2 O and waste heat, while both pyrolysis and gasification plant generate gaseous products consisting of (a mixture of non-condensable gases such as H2 , CO2 , and CO and light hydrocarbons “e.g. CH4 ” at room temperature, as well as H2 O (g), O2 and complex hydrocarbons e.g. C2 H2 , C2 H4 , etc.). In general, all combustion is as a result of air-fuel mixture burning (i.e. air or oxygen mixing directly with biomass/ coal or with liquid/gaseous hydrocarbon inside internal combustion engines), releases carbon dioxide and steam (H2 O) back into the atmosphere as well as producing energy for work. Specifically, during combustion, carbon combines with oxygen to produce carbon dioxide (CO2 ). The principal emission from transportation and power generating internal combustion engines is carbon dioxide (CO2 ). The level of CO2 emission is linked to the amount of fuel consumed and the type of fuel used as well as the individual engine’s operating characteristics. For instance, diesel-powered engines have higher emission than petrol/gasoline-powered engines. Although emphasis is places more on CO2 , this investigation is ultimately concerned with the real-time liquefaction of all the components of gaseous release/emissions -related to air pollution/health problem. It is believed that the mortality rate from air pollution is eight times larger than the mortality caused by car accidents each year. Pollutants with the strongest evidence for public health concern include particulate matter (PM), ozone (O3 ), nitrogen dioxide (NO2 ) and sulphur dioxide (SO2 ). All the exhaust effluents gases/flue gas and vent/flare gases are captured by liquefying them and then put to various uses, to achieve “Net zero” emissions. Fundamentally, the objective of the present invention is to develop a compact device (Universal Emissions Liquefiers) that can be retro-fitted onto the exhaust tailpipe-end of the internal combustion engines (diesel-powered, gasoline-powered, and hybrid automobiles-cars, vehicles, SUV’s, trucks, motor cycles, tri-cycles, portable electric generators, sea and cargo ships/ boats, trains, planes, rockets, etc.) and outlet of industrial machines that release flue gases through exhaust/scrubber channels, as well as crude oil, refined products storage tanks that vent greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, coal processing units/ plants and turn them into liquid { CO2 (l), N2 (l), O2 (l), etc.} or powdered components or chemically transform them in realtime with selective catalysts to any other specific compound, e.g. treating CO2 with hydrogen gas (H2) can produce methanol (CH3 OH), methane (CH4 ), or formic acid (HCOOH), while reaction of CO2 with alkali (e.g. NaOH) can give carbonates (NaHCO3 ) and bicarbonates (Na2 CO3 ). Nitrogen (N2 ) to ammonia (NH3 ) or Hydrazine (N2 H4 ), and molecular oxygen (O2 ) to hydrogen peroxide (H2 O2 ), et cetera. Alternatively, in new automobiles designs, the universal emissions liquefiers’ device can be directly net-worked on the floor alongside the catalytic converters and may eliminate the need for muffler/silencer/resonator. This is achieved by the application of any of the five main gas capture/separation technologies: Liquid absorption, Solid adsorption, Membrane separation (with and without solvent- organic or inorganic), Cryogenic refrigeration/distillation, and Electrochemical pH-swing separation or their combination to selectively trap and liquefy the individual pollutants. According to the fact from CarBuster, almost 0.009 metric tons of carbon dioxide is produced from every gallon of gasoline burned, which means that the average car user makes about 11.7 tons of carbon dioxide each year from their cars alone

This article highlights the need to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by reducing energy consumption. Of course, this can be achieved in various ways, but inter alia, through the practical implementation of the assumptions contained in the CSR programs of individual companies, which include a component on environmental protection and counteracting global warming. The authors also describe a proposal to reduce CO2 emissions by using coke oven gas (if necessary) in exchange for natural gas. Currently, the largest sources of carbon dioxide emissions are the combustion of fossil fuels in power plants, transport—cars and planes, processes related to the production of industrial goods, and deforestation. In the preparation of the article, the analysis of the literature on the subject, analysis of documents, desk research, and two case studies were used. The main goal of the article is to present the possibilities of reducing CO2 emissions by implementing the assumptions of the CSR policy on the example of a selected company (models of such activities are also given). Therefore, the aim of the article is to present selected activities that can contribute to the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions in enterprises; of course, this is specific each time and should be individually selected for each enterprise depending on financial, environmental, and any other conditions. This means that almost all enterprises, organizations, and all other institutions should be obliged to implement an individual environmental policy related to the possibility of reducing carbon dioxide emissions worldwide, and the effects of implementing the assumptions of this policy should be regularly, at least once a year, presented in the CSR reports of a given organization. However, each organization should provide its own examples of how it reduces carbon dioxide emissions. For this reason, this article presents an example of the Marcel CHP plant, which, due to its capabilities, also uses coke oven gas, the use of which results in lower emissions of carbon dioxide than natural gas. Additionally, the article presents a comparative analysis of the use of coke oven gas instead of natural gas. The obtained results show the significant and real possibilities of reducing carbon dioxide emissions.

Increased concem by policy makers with the threat of global climate change has brought with it considerable attention to the possibility of encouraging the growth of forests as a means of sequestering carbon dioxide (National Academy of Sciences [NAS], 1992; James P. Bruce et al., 1996).1 The Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (1997), which establishes emission reduction targets for the United States and other industrialized nations, states that carbon sequestration can be used by participating nations to achieve their targets. Moreover, even before the Kyoto agreement, this approach had become an explicit element of both U.S. and intemational climate policies (U.S. Department of Energy, 1991; United Nations General Assembly, 1992; William J. Clinton and Albert Gore, 1993). This high level of interest has been due, in part, to: suggestions that sufficient lands are available to use the approach to mitigate a substantial share of annual carbon dioxide (C02) emissions (Greg Marland, 1988; Daniel A. Lashof and Dennis A. Tirpak, 1989; Mark C. Trexler, 1991); and claims that growing trees to sequester carbon is a relatively inexpensive means of combating climate change (Roger A. Sedjo and Allen M. Solomon, 1989; Daniel J. Dudek and Alice LeBlanc, 1990; NAS, 1992). In other words, the serious attention given by policy makers to carbon sequestration can partly be explained by (implicit) assertions about respective marginal cost functions. I develop and demonstrate a method by which the costs of carbon sequestration can be estimated on the basis of evidence from landowners' behavior when confronted with the opportunity costs of alternative land uses. The simplest of previous economic analyses derived single point estimates of average costs associated with particular sequestration levels (Marland, 1988; Sedjo and Solomon, 1989; Dudek and LeBlanc, 1990; Edwin S. Rubin et al., 1992; Omar Masera et al., 1995). Often it has been assumed that land (opportunity) costs are zero (G. van Kooten et al., 1992; J. K. Winjum et al., 1992; New York State Energy Office, 1993; Robert K. Dixon et al, 1994). Another set of studies-essentially engineering/costing has constructed marginal cost schedules by using information on revenues and costs of production for altemative uses on representative types or locations of land, and then sorting these in ascending order of cost (Robert J. Moulton and Kenneth R. Richards, 1990; Richards et al., 1993). Simulation models include a model of the lost profits due to removing land from agricultural production (Peter J. Parks and Ian W. Hardie, 1995), a mathematical programming model of the agricultural sector and the timber market (Richard M. Adams et al, 1993), a related model incorporating the effects of agricultural price support programs (J. M. Callaway and Bruce McCarl, 1996), and a dynamic simulation model of forestry (Susan Swinehart, 1996). Lastly, an analysis by Andrew J. Plantinga (1995) adopts land-use elasticities from an econometric study to estimate sequestration costs. We draw on some of the best features of the previous studies, including the carbon levelization method of Moulton and Richards * John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 79 John F. Kennedy Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, and Resources for the Future. Richard Newell supplied excellent research assistance; and valuable comments on a previous version were provided by Lawrence Goulder, William Nordhaus, Andrew Plantinga, Kenneth Richards, two anonymous referees, participants in seminars at the Universities of California at Los Angeles and Santa Barbara, the University of Maryland, the University of Michigan, the University of Texas, Harvard University, Stanford University, Yale University, Resources for the Future, and the National Bureau of Economic Research. The author alone is resDonsible for any errors. 1 After fossil-fuel combustion, deforestation is the second largest source of carbon dioxide emissions. Estimates of annual global emissions from deforestation range from 0.6 to 2.8 billion tons, compared with slightly less than 6.0 billion tons annually from fossil-fuel combustion, cement manufacturing, and natural gas flaring, combined (R. A. Houghton, 1991; T. M. Smith et al., 1993).

Carbon dioxide emissions from the combustion of fossil fuels are a significant factor in global climate change. Large stationary sources such as coal-fired electric generating plants are likely to be the most cost-effective targets for carbon dioxide capture. At present, liquid amine-based scrubbing systems are the only processes available for this application. Processes based on regenerable solids that absorb carbon dioxide from flue gas and release it in concentrated form have the potential to be less expensive to operate. This paper summarises the results of studies conducted at RTI and Louisiana State University (LSU) to investigate the feasibility of using sodium or potassium carbonate as a sorbent. Upon reaction with carbon dioxide and water (also present in flue gas), this material is converted to sodium or potassium bicarbonate. Upon heating (ideally with low grade heat from the generating plant), carbon dioxide and water vapour are released and the solid carbonate can be reused. Work to date has focused on thermogravimetry (TG) and bench scale fluidised-bed testing, as well as characterisation of materials and thermodynamic and kinetic analyses. TG studies with sodium carbonate have indicated that the sorption reaction takes place rapidly at approximately 60°C and that the sorbent can be regenerated at temperatures less than 120°C. A five-cycle test conducted in a bench scale fluid bed reactor system indicated that the sorbent could be regenerated and reused. The process implications of compound salts and hydrates in the sodium carbonate system on the useful capacity of the sorbent and heat removal requirements were also investigated.

Chapter 1 - Building energy and environmental sustainability

The potential of direct air capture using adsorbents in cold climates.

This article is devoted to the problems of legislative regulation of carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere. The main sources of carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere today are the production, transportation, processing and consumption of fossil fuels (86%), the reduction of tropical forests and other biomass combustion (12%), and other sources. With the advent in the world of the industrial revolution in the mid-nineteenth century, there was a progressive increase in anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere that led to the disruption of the carbon cycle and growth CO2 concentration. Currently, about 57% of the carbon dioxide produced by mankind is removed from the atmosphere by plants and oceans. Carbon dioxide does not belong to toxic gas, however at inhalation of its raised concentrations in air on influence on the air-breathing live organisms carbon dioxide carry to suffocating gases. The concentration of carbon dioxide in the air today is one of the important factors affecting human life and health. Excess of this substance leads to a decrease in productivity, poor health or even death. In addition, carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas, which is the cause of gradual warming, which is known to have a negative impact on people's lives. Such consequences forced humanity to take measures to reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and control the volume of carbon dioxide emissions.

In December 2009, China government has officially announced, for the first time, a voluntary quantitative target of controlling its carbon dioxide emissions, which is to cut the carbon dioxide intensity (kg CO2 per GDP) by 40%~45% by the year 2020 (relative to the level of 2005). Transportation is one of the major sources of carbon dioxide emissions resulting from fossil fuel utilizations all over the world. In 2008 carbon dioxide emissions caused by transportation fuel combustion accounted for about 8% of the national total in China (Yang, 2011). This percentage is far behind some advanced economies, such as 33% in United States in 2004, 26% in Europe in 2004 (Wallington, 2008), and so forth. In either developing countries or developed countries road sector is responsible for approximate 80% of total carbon dioxide emissions resulting from transportation (Yang, 2011; Wallington, 2008), which indicates that road transportation has been playing a significant role in reducing transportation carbon dioxide emissions now and in the future. Compared with 824 vehicles per 1,000 people in United States in 2008 and 608 vehicles per 1,000 people in Japan in 2009, there were only about 68 vehicles per 1,000 people in China in 2010. It is clear that China’s vehicle population will be twice as many as present level when the vehicle ownership is doubled and meanwhile the national population is sustained. As an emerging economy, this situation will probably happen in next 5~10 years. Without revolutionary change of transportation system, the consequent carbon dioxide emissions from road transportation will possibly be doubled as well. It can be predicted that transportation sector would become one of the fastest growing sources of carbon dioxide emissions in China in next several decades. Thus, a low carbon transport system is expected to be proposed soon as a potential solution to addressing the conflict between the development of transportation and economy and the mitigation of climate change. In response to concerns over establishing the low carbon transport system and meeting the increasing domestic petroleum demand, interest in developing advanced vehicle technologies and alternative vehicle fuels has risen considerably in past ten years. Many research and demonstration programs of various technologies were supported by Chinese government, including light-duty vehicles (LDVs) using methanol (M85) and ethanol (E10), buses and taxies using liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), compressed natural gas (CNG), and liquefied natural gas (LNG), passenger cars and buses using dimethylether (DME), passenger cars using diesel, and so forth. Ethanol gasoline (E10) has been put into mandatory use since 2003 in five Chinese provinces (Jilin, Hei Longjiang, Henan, Anhui,

Aquatic biomass and carbon dioxide trapping