Abstract
This paper assesses the impact of environmental regulation stringency on the relocation of pollution-intensive firms in China. Pollution haven hypothesis (Porter theory) suggests that firms would (not) choose to relocate (but to innovate). We proxy the regulation stringency with multidimensional institutional capacity and construct an index by using the entropy method and find that stringency reduces the number and growth rate of pollution-intensive firms in highly regulated regions, especially these in heavy industries. An important channel for stringent regulations to hold back firm creation is the increased financing cost. Stringent regulations are not found to promote technology innovation presumably because relocation is less costly. Overall, the results support pollution haven hypothesis.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
