Abstract

ABSTRACTConventional wisdom suggests religious affiliation—especially evangelical identity—is directly instrumental in driving a distinct set of foreign policy preferences in the United States. I test this line of argument by examining the religious roots of defence-spending attitudes between 1982 and 2008. Using the Karlson, Holm, and Breen (KHB) method along with a series of regression estimates, I find the association of religious factors with such perceptions is more complicated than the straightforward logic of the conventional wisdom. While I find support for evangelical distinctiveness, I also find public perceptions divided across religious traditions along the lines of a specific form of religious belief and behaviour. Moreover, I obtain substantial mediated relationships between the religious variables and defence-spending attitudes via party ID and ideology. Finally, while comparing over time change in defence-spending attitudes across religious groups as well as presidential administrations, I find limited support for the claim that evangelicals demonstrated distinct preferences during President George W. Bush’s administration as compared to that under his predecessors since 1982.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.