Abstract
This study aims to explore how the framing of Islamic radicalism through the reporting of the group "ISIS" in two online media, namely in Republika.com and Tempo.co with an impartiality perspective. The research method used is descriptive qualitative by using a discourse strategy that sees the text and its context as information that contributes to communicating the contents of the message. Primary and secondary data are obtained from news curators, online portals, and library studies. While the unit of analysis is ISIS radicalism news in Republika.co.id and Tempo.co in the period of August to December 2014 that falls within the three criteria of radicalism news, namely acts of violence, beliefs championed, old-fashioned views or rigid thoughts that underlie acts of violence using techniques framing analysis of Gamson and Modigliani models. The results showed that news about radical "ISIS" included in the category of news construction that was emotional, sadistic, provocative and without confirmation. In addition, the quality of reporting often adorns with words that appear hyperbole and bombastic, the coverage is less profound and changes in a matter of minutes. The trend of Tempo.co and Republika.co.id dramatizes and exaggerates what happens in conflict areas by using connoted language rather than language that has a literal meaning. Then it has not fulfilled the principle of impartiality of news which can be seen from the neutrality and balance of news that determines the quality of reporting.
Highlights
Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk untuk mengupas bagaimana pembingkaian radikalisme Islam melalui pemberitaan kelompok “Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS)” di dua media online yaitu di Republika.com dan Tempo.co melalui perspektif imparsialitas
The ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and Syria) phenomenon has begun to be discussed in various national media in Indonesia
That was caused by the emergence of some Indonesian people who began to openly support groups who did not hesitate to disbelieve or even eliminate the lives of everyone who was different from him
Summary
Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk untuk mengupas bagaimana pembingkaian radikalisme Islam melalui pemberitaan kelompok “ISIS” di dua media online yaitu di Republika.com dan Tempo.co melalui perspektif imparsialitas. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskriptif kualitatif dengan memakai strategi discourse yang melihat teks dan konteksnya sebagai sebuah informasi yang berkontribusi dalam mengkomunikasikan isi pesan. Sedangkan unit analisisnya adalah berita radikalisme ISIS di Republika.co.id dan Tempo.co kurun waktu. Agustus hingga Desember 2014 yang masuk dalam tiga kriteria berita radikalisme yaitu tindakan kekerasan, keyakinan yang diperjuangkan, pandangan kolot atau pemikiran kaku yang melandasi tindakan kekerasan dengan menggunakan teknik analisis framing model Gamson dan Modigliani. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa berita mengenai radikalisme “ISIS” masuk dalam kategori kontruksi berita yang emosional, sadistik, provokatif dan tanpa konfirmasi. Kecendrungan Tempo.co dan Republika.co.id mendramatisir dan melebihlebihkan apa yang terjadi di wilayah konflik dengan menggunakan bahasa yang berkonotasi daripada bahasa yang bermakna harafiah.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
