Abstract

Albeit grotesque, the idea of religious dogs helps us to understand and criticize the power relations inherent in religion. The first part of the present paper analyzes two notes from Nietzsche's Nachlass that envisage an analogy between the relations of dogs to humans and of humans to God. Placed in their historical context of Darwinism and naturalistic conceptions of culture, these notes shed light on Nietzsche's critique of religious attitudes to domination. The second part — a reading of Kafka's 'Forschungen eines Hundes' — situates the analogy between the dog-human and human-God relationships at the centre of the story's irony. Kafka's use of the analogy differs from Nietzsche's by emphasizing the cognitive dimension of religious aspirations and giving less weight to the subordination to a more powerful agency. In the context of Kafka's work as a whole, however, the story suggests an approach to the relations between power and religion that is incompatible with Nietzsche's understanding of life as will to power.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.