Abstract

Application-specific instruction-set processors (ASIPs) allow the designer to extend the instruction set of the base processor with selected custom instructions to tailor-fit the application. In this paper, with the help of a motivational example, we first demonstrate that different custom instructions are vulnerable to faults with varying probabilities. This shows that by ignoring the vulnerability to faults, traditional methods of instruction set customization can provide no guarantees on the reliability of the system. Apart from such inherent disparity in error vulnerability across custom instructions, each custom instruction can have multiple implementation choices corresponding to varying hardened levels. Hardening reduces the vulnerability to errors but this comes at the overhead of area costs and reduced performance gain. In this paper, we propose a framework to select custom instructions and their respective hardening levels such that reliability is optimized while the performance gain is satisfied and area costs are met as well. Our framework is based on a novel analytical method to compute the overall system reliability based on the probability of failure of individual instructions. Wide range of experiments that were conducted illustrate how our tool navigates the design space to reveal interesting tradeoffs.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.