Abstract
Purpose: To describe and compare the late outcome of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) in terms of the carers' perspectives, and their symptoms' profiles. Method: Postal survey to surviving patients who had been discharged from a Regional Neurosurgical Unit five to seven years previously. There were 288 patients identified retrospectively from hospital records, of whom 209 (126 TBI and 83 SAH) were alive and traced at follow-up. The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) and the Relative's Questionnaire (RQ) were used. Results: Relative's questionnaires were returned by 128 patients; 70 TBI and 58 SAH, giving response rates of 56% and 70% respectively. In terms of outcome, there was a high degree of similarity between groups. On the GOS, approximately half of each group were classified as moderately disabled (49% and 48% of the TBI and SAH groups respectively); a quarter remained severely disabled (27% and 22% ); and the remaining quarter were adjudged to have made a good recovery (24% and 29% ). There was a considerable overlap in terms of the most commonly reported symptoms. Cognitive and physical problems tended to be more commonly reported by relatives of the TBI patients, whilst emotional and subjective symptoms were reported equally in both patient groups. Conclusions: The effects of TBI and SAH persist for many years post-injury, leading to considerable disability and increased dependency. Although the demographic details and mechanisms of injury in these two patient groups differ, there is a high degree of similarity in the pattern of sequelae reported by carers.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.