Abstract

PurposeThe physical and social neighborhood environments are increasingly recognized as determinants for depression. There is little evidence on combined effects of multiple neighborhood characteristics and their importance. Our aim was (1) to examine associations between depression severity and multiple perceived neighborhood environments; and (2) to assess their relative importance.MethodsCross-sectional data were drawn from a population-representative sample (N = 9435) from the Netherlands. Depression severity was screened with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and neighborhood perceptions were surveyed. Supervised machine learning models were employed to assess depression severity-perceived neighborhood environment associations.ResultsWe found indications that neighborhood social cohesion, pleasantness, and safety inversely correlate with PHQ-9 scores, while increasing perceived distance to green space and traffic were correlated positively. Perceived distance to blue space and urbanicity seemed uncorrelated. Young adults, low-income earners, low-educated, unemployed, and divorced persons were more likely to have higher PHQ-9 scores. Neighborhood characteristics appeared to be less important than personal attributes (e.g., age, marital and employment status). Results were robust across different ML models.ConclusionsThis study suggested that the perceived social environment plays, independent of socio-demographics, a role in depression severity. Contrasted with person-level and social neighborhood characteristics, the prominence of the physical neighborhood environment should not be overstated.

Highlights

  • It is gradually established that people’s mental health is shaped, in addition to person-level attributes [1], by the neighborhood environment, which can be broadly categorized into physical and social characteristics [2]

  • The lowest median mean absolute error (MAE) and root-mean-square error (RMSE) were achieved by gradient boosting machine (GBM), while generalized linear model (GLM) had the highest errors

  • Wilcoxon tests showed that the median performance of GBM was always significantly better than the one of GLM (p < 0.050)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is gradually established that people’s mental health is shaped, in addition to person-level attributes [1], by the neighborhood environment, which can be broadly categorized into physical and social characteristics [2]. It is theorized that green and blue space [12], and social capital [13] were beneficial because such factors may be stress-reducing and buffer against negative thoughts [14], while neighborhood safety and social cohesion could act as coping mechanisms to safeguard from psychological distress [4]. Associations such as these are, not universally confirmed, and the mechanisms are yet to be fully understood

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.