Abstract
Persuasive one- and two-sided communications were placed in two competing mock proposals and evaluated by 27 experienced government evaluators as subjects. The experimental conditions closely simulated real proposals and the mechanics of a government evaluation process. Evaluation scores, although in the predicted direction, did not differ significantly and failed to substantiate the advantage of two-sided communications as reported by Hovland, Janis, and Kelley (1953).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
