Abstract

Perceived annoyance due to traffic noise and lack of urban green space is mostly determined using data from self-administered questionnaires. However, there is still no clear evidence to what extent such perceived measures are related to objectively assessed environmental data and whether socioeconomic dimensions modify such relationships. In a cross-sectional study in Dortmund, Germany, georeferenced home addresses from parents with preschool aged children were used to analyse relations between exposures to objectively measured green space and traffic noise and subjective annoyance due to noise and lack of green space with the additional consideration of socioeconomic characteristics as effect modifiers. Higher perceived annoyance correlated with higher objectively measured traffic noise and lower objectively measured green, respectively. Stratified logistic regression models indicated a modifying role of socioeconomic characteristics. The strengths of associations between objectively measured environmental exposures and perceived annoyance differed by socioeconomic strata. Especially for noise, odds ratios were higher in low socioeconomic strata than in high socioeconomic strata. Therefore, using objective measures of the built environment as a proxy for individual perception should be made with caution as negative relations between objectively assessed built environments and health could be underestimated when considering individual socioeconomic position only as a confounder.

Highlights

  • Evidence from epidemiological studies shows that neighbourhood built environments are associated with individual health and health behaviours and contribute to social inequalities in health [1,2,3,4,5,6]

  • The built environment in urban areas covers many dimensions, such as transportation, land use, or public services which are both sources of environmental stressors and environmental resources [7]

  • Assuming that perception of the environment is relevant for predicting health outcomes the use of objective environmental measures may lead to underestimation of health impacts when socioeconomic dimensions are only taken into account as confounders

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Evidence from epidemiological studies shows that neighbourhood built environments are associated with individual health and health behaviours and contribute to social inequalities in health [1,2,3,4,5,6]. The built environment in urban areas covers many dimensions, such as transportation, land use, or public services which are both sources of environmental stressors (e.g., air and noise pollution) and environmental resources (e.g., urban green space and other recreational areas) [7]. To analyse environmental health risks and the contribution of environmental burdens and resources to environmental health inequalities, characteristics of the built environment can be measured either subjectively or objectively. Objective measures are mostly derived from land use plans, noise level data, Int. J. Public Health 2018, 15, 1562; doi:10.3390/ijerph15081562 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.