Abstract

The safety of vaccination in multiple sclerosis (MS) raises concern, particularly the relapse risk post-vaccination. With the recent H1N1 pandemic, people with chronic diseases, including neurological conditions such as MS, were prioritised for vaccination. Two questions therefore arise in this context: whether vaccination increases the relapse rate, and whether the relapse is more severe postvaccination. Seasonal influenza immunisation does not increase the risk of MS exacerbation; a systematic review found no increased risk of early (3–4 weeks post-vaccination) or late (4–6 months) exacerbations [1]. Likewise, influenza vaccination resulted in no relative increase in disease-activity to controls based on new Gd-enhancing lesions on MRI [2, 3]. The evidence is less clear-cut regarding the pandemic influenza H1N1 vaccine and relapse risk. Reports from the 1970s suggested an increased risk of Guillan-Barre and MS-like syndromes following this vaccine [4], although formal controlled trials did not. Two placebo controlled studies involving 88 and 127 MS patients, reported similar frequency of MS relapses in the H1N1 and placebo-vaccinated groups [5, 6] (12 vs. 14% and 3 vs. 6.5%, respectively). In our acute weekly relapse clinic, we recorded data from 30 consecutive patients between 11/2009 and 01/2010. During this period in the UK, all MS patients were actively offered H1N1 vaccination [7]. Relapse onset date, and H1N1/seasonal influenza vaccination status (with administration date where appropriate) were recorded. The expanded disability status scale (EDSS), multiple sclerosis impact scale (MSIS-29 v 2.0), and use of corticosteroid treatment were also documented. Eighteen (60%) of patients received either/both vaccination prior to relapse onset, leaving 40% not vaccinated (Table 1). Neither the relapse severity (EDSS/MSIS-29 v 2.0) nor the numbers receiving corticosteroid treatment were significantly different (Table 1). The association between relapse rate and vaccination in a relapse clinic can be evaluated using a case-crossover design; as in a previous report of different vaccinations in MS relapse clinics [8]. This method compares vaccine exposure in a specified risk period immediately preceding the relapse to that in several prior control periods of equal duration, thus quantifying the relative relapse risk in the specified post-vaccination period. Using a similar analysis in our 30 patients, 15 received H1N1 vaccination (Fig. 1a, flow chart); of whom 10

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.