Abstract
Fired-clay ceramics gain mass with time as a result of rehydroxylation (RHX) of the dehydroxylated structures of clay minerals. The mass gain is usually described using the time to the quarter (TTTQ) model, which is fundamental to the archeometric dating technique called RHX dating. In RHX dating practice, experimental mass gain fits can be improved by adding a time-offset correction (t0), apparently corresponding to changes in diffusional parameters.Using theoretical mass gain data generated by diffusional, geometric contraction, and reaction-order kinetic models, we showed that TTTQ model can successfully fit data produced by any deceleratory kinetic model, especially if the t0 is applied. The quality of the fits and linearity of Arrhenius plots of theoretical data likely would cause misidentification of the reaction model in favor of TTTQ model in RHX dating practice. The model misidentification results in incorrect values of activation energy (Ea) despite ideal mass gain fits and linearity of Arrhenius plots. In this paper we question the validity of t0 and propose a calculation of correct Ea from any RHX mass gain data using a model-independent approach.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
