Abstract
Host country institutions lead to the liability of foreignness. However, few studies have empirically examined an institutional source of this liability - industrial regulation. Filling this gap, we explore the regulatory liability of foreignness in the U.S. banking industry and find that foreign subsidiaries are more likely to face regulatory enforcement actions than domestic banks. However, when we distinguish between bank risk-related regulations and local stakeholder-related regulations, only the latter impose extra burdens on subsidiaries. Moreover, greater parent bank human capital and host country experience help its subsidiaries comply more effectively with local regulations. By contrast, the international experience of a parent bank intensifies regulatory liabilities of its subsidiary, particularly in compliance with local stakeholder-related regulations.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.