Abstract

In the aftermath of bank proprietary trading losses in the 2007–09 crisis, the Basel framework uses stressed Conditional Value-at-Risk to set minimum capital requirements for proprietary trading portfolios, whereas the Volcker rule restricts their composition in the US. With or without this rule, such requirements have the benefit of inducing a reduction in the risk of the optimal portfolio (measured by standard deviation) but at the cost of increasing its risk-to-minimum capital requirement ratio. As a hypothetical regulatory alternative, the proper use of standard deviation to set minimum capital requirements and circumvent pro-cyclicality improves upon the Basel framework and Volcker rule.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.