Abstract
Robo-advisors are internet-based advisory services that use algorithms to create investment recommendations with no human input, and they are growing in popularity. They deliver financial advice at a fraction of the cost of traditional financial advisors. However, the nature of the interaction between client and machine raises many legal questions and concerns. It is unclear how regulators should approach the phenomenon. Regulators in major jurisdictions have taken different approaches. This article argues that robo-advisory is essentially different from traditional financial advice. Nevertheless, it demonstrates that current regulation, in particular the European Union framework for financial intermediaries, is able to address most of the resulting issues. The core conclusion is that, in applying the existing rules to robo-advisors, the rules should not be interpreted to create a level playing field for all market participants.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.