Abstract

The Australian state of New South Wales (NSW) was the first jurisdiction to fully deregulate law firm structure and allow incorporated legal practices without restriction on ownership. At the same time it also required that these firms implement ‘appropriate management systems’ for ensuring the provision of legal services in conformance with compliance with professional ethical obligations. This paper presents a preliminary empirical evaluation of the impact of this attempt at ‘management-based regulation’ to require firms to implement an ethical infrastructure. We find that the NSW requirement that firms self-assess their own compliance with this requirement leads to a large and statistically significant drop in complaints, but that the (self-assessed) level of implementation of ethical infrastructure does not make any difference. The applicability of these findings to other firms and jurisdictions is discussed, and the NSW approach distinguished from the English Legal Aid approach to regulating law firm quality management.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.