Abstract
We present the results of a simulation study performed to compare the accuracy of a lassotype penalization method and gradient boosting in estimating the baseline hazard function and covariate parameters in discrete survival models. The mean square error results reveal that the lasso-type algorithm performs better in recovering the baseline hazard and covariate parameters. In particular, gradient boosting underestimates the sizes of the parameters and also has a high false positive rate. Similar results are obtained in an application to real-life data.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
