Abstract

Interest has grown over recent years in policy programs targeting a green, bio-based economy. In the European Union, the European Commission promotes the development of bioeconomy policy and encourages the use of biomass and waste for industrial purposes. Alongside these technical dimensions, European bioeconomy policy also promotes knowledge sharing, learning from others, and so-called ‘best practice’. Consequently, many European places and policymakers that have committed to developing a bio-based economy are now sharing their positive policy experiences. However, sharing ‘best practice’ for green economy policy programs has sometimes been described as producing oversimplified views of complex climate issues. Despite such criticisms, policymakers continue to search for and share bioeconomy policy ‘best practice’. This paper explores the development of bioeconomy policy with a focus on shareability and dissemination of ‘best practice’ in two Swedish regions, Värmland and Västerbotten. Herein, we adopt the conceptual underpinnings of urban policy mobilities to explain green policymaking, and more specifically bioeconomy policy development on a regional scale. So far, policy mobilities research has had a primarily urban focus, whereas this paper provides valuable insights into how these processes take place within regional and more peripheral settings. Thus, we seek to understand the role of ‘best practice’ in the development of regional bioeconomy policies and which elements of these policies are promoted as transferable elsewhere.

Highlights

  • Several international policy programs targeting the green economy have been launched on various geographic scales

  • This paper focuses on the development of policy towards a biobased green economy, and on a forest-based bioeconomy

  • We set out to explore the development of regional green economy policies in two Swedish regions self-identifying as using ‘best practice’ in bioeconomy policy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Several international policy programs targeting the green economy have been launched on various geographic scales (cf. OECD, 2010, EC, 2011; UNEP, 2011). Albeit a good and amicable ambition, the sharing of green policy through best practice has been criticized for producing oversimplified views of complex climate issues (Rosol et al, 2017; Temenos and McCann, 2012). Despite such criti­ cisms, the search for ‘best practice’ through green economy policy programs and tools continues (cf RFSC, 2016; EC, 2020; SymbioCity, 2020). According to the European Commission, it can be understood as a larger societal transformation to a production system based on renewable materials, including waste and biomass. The European Commission connects the development of a bioeconomy to wider economic strategies of green growth and circularity as presented in Agenda 2030 and the Paris Agreement (EC, 2012; 2018)

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.