Abstract
Hubbard and Kropf's explanation of my results is based on the statement that the experiments were “performed in circumstances in which photochemical and thermal processes take place side by side”. The implication here is that irradiation converted the parent visual pigment to an orange photoproduct, and that this photoproduct was unstable and decayed to indicator yellow. This is not so. It was explicitly stated that the orange photoproduct produced by irradiating frog rhodopsin at − 5° C. was thermally stable.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
