Abstract

The article aims to discuss the problems of teaching and studying the scientific laws. It is dedicated to the anniversary of Dmitriy Mendeleev’s Periodic Law, but the author discusses the scientific laws in a broad epistemological and educational context. In the first section of the article, the author determines the purpose of education at a research university on the basis of Wilhelm von Humboldt’s ideas. She emphasizes that, in contrast to school education, which is focused on the transfer of ready-made knowledge, university education should generate critical thinking. In the context of such distinction between educational goals, a research question is formulated. How to make the practice of teaching a scientific law truly relevant to research university, and not only and not so much to school education? The answer to this question consistently considers two interrelated aspects of the possible education of future researchers. The author describes the historical aspect of teaching the scientific laws through two strategies of the history of science – antiquarianism and presentism. She demonstrates that antiquarianism can contribute to the formation of critical thinking. The author reveals the ontological aspect of teaching the scientific laws and relates it with the critic of objectivism in interpretation of scientific knowledge. In conclusion she argues that the proposed approach may contribute to the generation of scientific thinking aimed at finding new knowledge.

Highlights

  • It is dedicated to the anniversary of Dmitriy Mendeleev's Periodic Law

  • How to make the practice of teaching a scientific law truly relevant to research university, and and not so much to school education?

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Аспект преподавания раскрывается через две возможные трактовки научного закона в онтологическом плане – как открытого «закона природы» или как элемента предметной реальности науки. В ответе на этот вопрос, как уже было сказано, будут раскрыты два взаимосвязанных аспекта возможного образования будущего учёного при преподавании научного закона: исторический, задающий отношение к историческому статусу научного знания, и онтологический, формирующий отношение к онтологическому статусу научной предметности. Самое важное состоит в том, что при этом дополнительным к раскрытию «вневременного» содержания закона оказывается выявление механизмов трансляции соответствующего знания, перевода его от одной научной традиции к другой, перевода необходимого, даже если они не далеки во времени друг от друга5.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.